green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1957 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1957
1991
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Vornado, Inc. v. Hyland
(2×)
See Gundaker Central Motors v. Gassert, 23 N.J. 71, 82 (1956) appeal dism. 354 U.S. 933 , 77 S.Ct. *362 1397, 1 L.Ed. 2d 1533 (1957); McGowan v. Maryland, supra ( 366 U.S. at 541 , 81 S.Ct. 1101 , concurring opinion of Frankfurter, J.).
cited
Cited "see"
Bergman v. Senate Special Committee on Aging
See Flaxer v. United States, 235 F.2d 821 , 98 U.S.App.D.C. 324 (1956), remanded on other grounds, 354 U.S. 929 , 77 S.Ct. 1392 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1533 (1957) .
discussed
Cited "see"
Sente v. Mayor and Mun. Coun. Clifton
(2×)
See Gundaker Central Motors v. Gassert, 23 N. J. 71 (1956), appeal dismissed, 354 U. S. 933 , 77 S. Ct. 1397 , 1 L.Ed. 2d 1533 (1957).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Moity
See, Adams Newark Theatre Co. v. City of Newark, 22 N.J. 472 , 126 A.2d 340 , affirmed 354 U.S. 931 , 77 S.Ct. 1395 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1533 , rehearing denied 355 U.S. 851 , 78 S.Ct. 8 , 2 L.Ed.2d 61 ; People v. Arnold, 127 Cal.App.2d Supp. 844 , 273 P.2d 711 ; Taylor v. State, 194 Miss. 1 , 11 So.2d 663 , reversed on other grounds 319 U.S. 583 , 63 S.Ct. 1200 , 87 L.Ed. 1600 ; Gilbert v. Minnesota, 254 U.S. 325 , 41 S.Ct. 125 , 65 L.Ed. 287 ; State v. Holm, 139 Minn. 267 , 166 N.W. 181 , L.R.A.1918C, 304; State v. McKee, 73 Conn. 18 , 46 A. 409 , 49 L.R.A. 542 , 84 Am.St.Rep. 124 ; Beauharnais v. Il…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Repair Master, Inc. v. Borough of Paulsboro
Barring obscenity and lewdness, Expo, Inc. v. City of Passaic, 149 N.J.Super. 416 , 373 A. 2d 1045 (Law Div.1977); see also Adams Newark Theatre Co. v. City of Newark, 22 N.J. 472 , 126 A. 2d 340 (1956), aff'd, 354 U.S. 931 , 77 S.Ct. 1395 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1533 (1957); rehearing denied, 355 U.S. 851 , 78 S.Ct. 8 , 2 L.Ed.2d 61 (1957); 12.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
NYT CABLE TV v. Homestead at Mansfield, Inc.
(2×)
In analyzing the constitutionality of legislation, one of the most basic of presumptions is "that a statute will not be declared inoperative and unenforceable unless it is plainly in contravention of a constitutional mandate or prohibition." Profaci, supra, 56 N.J. at 349 (citing cases); see also Gundaker Central Motors, Inc. v. Gassert, 23 N.J. 71, 81 (1956), app. dismissed 354 U.S. 933 , 77 S.Ct. 1397 , 1 L.Ed. 2d 1533 (1957) (duty of court to uphold legislation unless there is no room for doubt as to its violation of constitutional provisions).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Flaxer
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 462.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 24, 1957.
David Rein and Joseph Forer for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Tompkins and Doris H. Spangenburg for the United States.
Clark, Consideration, Stated, Supra, Took, Watkins.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
Per Curiam:
The petition for writ of certiorari in this case is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of Watkins v. United States, 354[*930] U. S. 178.
David Rein and Joseph Forer for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Tompkins and Doris H. Spangenburg for the United States. Mr. Justice Burton took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Mr. Justice Clark dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Watkins v. United States, supra.