green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.5 score
“he trial judge . . . has the duty to deter and correct misconduct of attorneys with respect to their obligations as officers of the court to support the authority of the court and enable the trial to proceed with dignity”
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Smith v. McCleskey, Harriger, Brazill, & Graf, L.L.P.
Greater Houston Transportation Co. v. Phillips, 801 S.W.2d 523, 525 (Tex.1990); but see Mitchell v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company, 786 S.W.2d 659, 662 (Tex.), cert. den’d, 498 U.S. 896 , 111 S.Ct. 247 , 112 L.Ed.2d 205 (1990)(recognizing that the existence of a duty may involve a question of fact).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Thalheim v. Town of Greenwich
he trial judge . . . has the duty to deter and correct misconduct of attorneys with respect to their obligations as officers of the court to support the authority of the court and enable the trial to proceed with dignity
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Faile v. Town of Stratford
In re Dodson , 214 Conn. 344 , 363, 572 A.2d 328 , cert. denied, *210 498 U.S. 896 , 111 S.Ct. 247 , 112 L.Ed.2d 205 1990).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Anderson v. Gallow, No. 055145 (Mar. 30, 2001)
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
In addition, "authority" can be and has been interpreted to mean the "[r]ight to exercise powers; to implement and enforce laws; to exact obedience; to command; to judge. . . . [It is] [o]ften synonymous with power." (Brackets in original.) Id., 350.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
In re Jonathan M.
Although as a trial judge must adhere to the dictates of impartiality, he or she, “nevertheless, has the duty to deter and correct misconduct of attorneys with respect to their obligations as officers of the court to support the authority of the court and enable the trial to proceed with dignity.” Id., 354.
cited
Cited "see"
CFM of Connecticut, Inc. v. Chowdhury
See In re Dodson, 214 Conn. 344, 361 , 572 A.2d 328 , cert. denied, 498 U.S. 896 , 111 S. Ct. 247 , 112 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Ullmann v. State
See In re Dodson, 214 Conn. 344, 352 , 572 A.2d 328 , cert. denied, 498 U.S. 896 , 111 S. Ct. 247 , 112 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Traficante
See United States v. Penta, 898 F.2d 815 (1st Cir.), cert denied, 498 U.S. 896 , 111 S.Ct. 246 , 112 L.Ed.2d 205 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Winstar Corp. v. United States
See Education Assistance Corp. v. Cavazos, 902 F.2d 617, 629 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 896 , 111 S.Ct. 246 , 112 L.Ed.2d 205 (1990) (citing POSSE and recognizing Congress’ power to amend a statute).
discussed
Cited "see"
Winstar Corporation v. United States
See Education Assistance Corp. v. Cavazos, 902 F.2d 617, 629 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 896 , 111 S.Ct. 246 , 112 L.Ed.2d 205 (1990) (citing POSSE and recognizing Congress' power to amend a statute).
discussed
Cited "see"
Winstar Corp. v. United States
See Education Assistance Corp. v. Cavazos, 902 F.2d 617, 629 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 896 , 111 S.Ct. 246 , 112 L.Ed.2d 205 (1990) (citing POSSE and recognizing Congress’ power to amend a statute).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Francis Connor, Jr.
See United States v. Penta, 898 F.2d 815 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 246 , 112 L.Ed.2d 205 (1990).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Nicholas Garcia and John O'valle, Jr.
See, e.g., United States v. Italiano, 894 F.2d 1280 , 1282 n. 2 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 896 , 111 S.Ct. 246 , 112 L.Ed.2d 205 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gigante
See United States v. Gengo, 808 F.2d 1, 3 (2d Cir.1986)(“notice is the touchstone in deciding whether a superseding indictment substantially changes the original charges”); see also United States v. Italiano, 894 F.2d 1280, 1283 (11th Cir.)(notice is the “central policy underlying the statutes of limitations”), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 896 , 111 S.Ct. 246 , 112 L.Ed.2d 205 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Graham v. Freese & Nichols, Inc.
Greater Houston Transportation Co. v. Phillips, 801 S.W.2d 523 (Tex.1990); see also Mitchell v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company, 786 S.W.2d 659, 662 (Tex.), cert. den’d, 498 U.S. 896 , 111 S.Ct. 247 , 112 L.Ed.2d 205 (1990)(recognizing that the existence of a duty is a question of law but that certain elements of duty may involve a question of fact).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John L. Cheek
Compare United States v. Glasser, 773 F.2d 1553, 1557 (11th Cir.1985) (intradistrict transfer excludable) with United States v. Penta, 898 F.2d 815, 818-19 (1st Cir.) (not excludable), cert. denied) 498 U.S. 896 , 111 S.Ct. 246 , 112 L.Ed.2d 205 (1990).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Education Assistance Corp.
v.
Cavazos, Secretary of Education
v.
Cavazos, Secretary of Education
No. 90-84.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1990.
Published
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Connecticut (1)
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.