green
Positive treatment
2.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Pueblo of Santa Ana v. Kelly
See Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. Wisconsin, 770 F.Supp. 480, 481 (W.D.Wis.1991), appeal dismissed 957 F.2d 515 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, Wisconsin v. Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians, 506 U.S. 829 , 113 S.Ct. 91 , 121 L.Ed.2d 53 (1992); S.Rep.
discussed
Cited "see"
California Union Insurance v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
See Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. Wisconsin, 957 F.2d 515, 517 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 829 , 113 S.Ct. 91 , 121 L.Ed.2d 53 (1992); cf. United States v. Deutsch, 981 F.2d 299, 301 (7th Cir.1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Quinten A. Hammes, Jr.
See Lac du Flambeau Indians v. Wisconsin, 770 F.Supp. 480, 486 (W.D.Wis.1991), appeal dismissed, 957 F.2d 515 (7th Cir.1992), certiorari denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 91 , 121 L.Ed.2d 53 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cambridge Plating Co. v. Napco, Inc.
Compare Lac Du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. Wisconsin, 957 F.2d 515, 517 (7th Cir.) (supporting memorandum filed with insufficiently particular motion), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 829 , 113 *761 S.Ct. 91, 121 L.Ed.2d 53 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jerry Washington and Herbert Edward James
United States v. Olano, - U.S. -, -, 113 S.Ct. 1770, 1777-78 , 123 L.Ed.2d 508 (1993); see Fed.R.Crim.P. 52(b) (“Plain errors or defects affecting substantial rights may be noticed although they were not brought to the attention of the court.”); see, e.g., Bradford v. Whitley, 953 F.2d 1008, 1013 (5th Cir.) (referring to defendant as “liar" no violation of substantive rights in context of entire closing argument), cert. denied,-U.S.-, 113 S.Ct. 91 , 121 L.Ed.2d 53 (1992); United States v. Nanez, 694 F.2d 405, 410 (5th Cir.1982) (holding that for bolstering to constitute plain error, the …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Willis v. Fordice
The Committee concluded that the compact process is a viable mechanism for setting [sic] various matters between two equal sovereigns.’” Mashantucket Pequot Tribe, 913 F.2d at 1030 (emphasis added) (quoting Senate Report at 13, U.S.Code Cong. & Admin.News 1988, 3083); see also Lac du Flambeau Indians v. Wisconsin, 770 F.Supp. 480, 481 (W.D.Wis.1991) (concluding that “[t]he structure of the Act conforms to the basic principle that the states and tribes negotiate as sovereigns”), appeal dismissed, 957 F.2d 515 (7th Cir.), cert, denied , — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 91 , 121 L.Ed.2d 53 (1992).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Transoil (Jersey) Ltd.
v.
Belcher Oil Co.
v.
Belcher Oil Co.
No. 91-2032.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1992.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.