green
Positive treatment
4.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
John Charles Middleton v. J.E. McDonald Clinton County Sheriff's Department
See United States v. Alpine Land & Reservoir Co., 984 F.2d 1047, 1049 (9th Cir.) (stating that Supreme Court admonitions regarding Rule 60(b) indicate that subsection (6) “relief is available only where extraordinary circumstances prevented a litigant from seeking earlier, more timely relief’), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 813 , 114 S.Ct. 60 , 126 L.Ed.2d 29 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Woodcock v. United States Ex Rel. Department of Education (In Re Woodcock)
See United States v. Alpine Land & Reservoir Co., 984 F.2d 1047, 1049-50 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 813 , 114 S.Ct. 60 , 126 L.Ed.2d 29 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sierra Club Headwaters, Inc. Forest Conservation Council and Oregon Natural Resources Council v. Bruce Babbitt, Secretary, U.S. Department of Interior, and Seneca Sawmill Company, an Oregon Corporation, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant. Sierra Club v. Bruce Babbitt, Sierra Club v. Bruce Babbitt, and Seneca Sawmill Company, an Oregon Corporation, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee
See Madera Irrigation Dist. v. Hancock, 985 F.2d 1397 , 1400-01 (9th Cir.) (explaining that within the limitations prescribed by the Fifth Amendment, Congress has the power to modify an agency's contractual commitments to a private entity), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 59 , 126 L.Ed.2d 29 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sierra Club v. Babbitt
See Madera Irrigation Dist. v. Hancock 985 F.2d 1397 , 1400-01 (9th Cir.) (explaining that within the limitations prescribed by the Fifth Amendment, Congress has the power to modify an agency’s contractual commitments to a private entity), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 59 , 126 L.Ed.2d 29 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re William Lee Hausler, Debtor. William Lee Hausler Ernel McCloskey Conservator of the Estate of William Lee Hausler v. Heidi Wagner Lilliane Dausse, Kathleen Jane Hobrow Louis Hesson East Bay Area Tumor Institute Heart Lung Institute of the East Bay George T. Brady, of the Estate of A. Berens Nelson
See United States v. Alpine Land & Reservoir Co., 984 F.2d 1047, 1049-50 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 60 , 126 L.Ed.2d 29 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Independent Petroleum Association of America v. Bruce Babbitt
(2×)
The court also determined that even if the letter were a rule, it was exempt from notice-and-comment rulemaking because "it clearly was interpretative not substantive." Id. at * 6; see also APA, 5 U.S.C. § 553 (b)(A) ("[T]his subsection does not apply ... to interpretative rules, general statements of policy, or rules of agency organization, procedure, or practice."). 26 The District Court next concluded that, despite the plaintiffs' protestations, it would apply to Assistant Secretary Deer's decision the deferential Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 83…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Enron Oil & Gas Co.
v.
Babbitt, Secretary of the Interior
v.
Babbitt, Secretary of the Interior
92-1726.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1993.
Published
Enron Oil & Gas Co.
v.
Babbitt, Secretary of the Interior, et al.
No. 92-1726.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 4, 1993.
1
Appeal from the C. A. 5th Cir.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 978 F. 2d 212.