green
Positive treatment
5.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Jarvis v. Comm'r, Soc. Sec. Admin.
If the agency fails to make a timely determination, the requester constructively exhausts his administrative remedies and may seek judicial review without first having to pursue an administrative appeal. 5 U.S.C. § 552 (a)(6)(C) ; see Pollack v. Dep't of Justice , 49 F.3d 115 , 118-19 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 516 U.S. 843 , 116 S.Ct. 130 , 133 L.Ed.2d 78 (1995) ; Waldner v. U.S. Dep't of Justice , 981 F.Supp.2d 14 , 16-17 (D.D.C. 2013), aff'd , No. 13-5350, 2014 WL 3014045 (D.C.
discussed
Cited "see"
Espinoza v. Department of Justice
See Rosenberg v. U.S. Dep’t of Immig. and Customs Enforcement, 954 F.Supp.2d 1, 10 (D.D.C.2013) (“The fact that a fee request was made after the [p]laintiff commenced litigation does not excuse the [p]laintiff from paying the requested fees.”) (citing Pollack v. Dep’t of Justice, 49 F.3d 115, 120 (4th Cir.1995), cert denied, 516 U.S. 843 , 116 S.Ct. 130 , 133 L.Ed.2d 78 (1995)) (other citations omitted). *244 In the January 2, 2013 fee assessment letter, EOUSA informed plaintiff that his request would be closed if he failed to pay the fees and that he could appeal the decision to OIP.
discussed
Cited "see"
Banks v. Department of Justice
See Pollack v. Dep’t of Justice, 49 F.3d 115, 120 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 843 , 116 S.Ct. 130 , 133 L.Ed.2d 78 (1995); Trueblood, 943 F.Supp. at 68-69. i. Neither the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network Nor the Department of State Received a FOIA or Privacy Act Request From Plaintiff Defendants argue that plaintiff cannot maintain his claims against the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) and the United States Department of State because he failed to exhaust his administrative remedies before filing suit.
discussed
Cited "see"
Trueblood v. US DEPT. OF TREASURY, IRS
See Pollack v. Department of Justice, 49 F.3d 115, 120 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 116 S.Ct. 130 , 133 L.Ed.2d 78 (1995) (payment of fees is a statutory requirement under the FOIA and filing of a FOIA suit does not relieve the requester of the obligation to pay).
discussed
Cited "see"
Trueblood v. United States Department of the Treasury
See Pollack v. Department of Justice, 49 F.3d 115, 120 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 130 , 133 L.Ed.2d 78 (1995) (payment of fees is a statutory requirement under the FOIA and filing of a FOIA suit does not relieve the requester of the obligation to pay).
cited
Cited "see"
Percy E. Cooksey, III v. Paul K. Delo
See O’Neal v. Delo, 44 F.3d 655, 662 (8th Cir.) (defining constitutional fair cross-section requirements), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 129 , 133 L.Ed.2d 78 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Boyle v. Johnson
(2×)
See O’Neal v. Delo, 44 F.3d 655, 661 (8th Cir.) (finding evidence that defendant was a member of a racist group relevant and therefore admissible under Dawson where “racial animus as a motive for [the] murder was an issue in the trial”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 129 , 133 L.Ed.2d 78 (1995).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Carton
v.
Missouri Pacific Railroad Co.
v.
Missouri Pacific Railroad Co.
No. 94-9571.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 1995.
Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.