green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
15.6 score
G Cite
cited 4× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1998 ·
…a committee report, representing a collective statement by the drafters about the intended purpose of proposed legislation, is considered a particularly good indicator of congressional intent when it is otherwise difficult to ascertain.
⚠ not in text
cited 4× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1998 ·
…party must exhaust tribal court remedies before a federal district court may entertain a challenge to tribal jurisdiction.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
WLNY-TV, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
(2×)
a committee report, representing a collective statement by the drafters about the intended purpose of proposed legislation, is considered a particularly good indicator of congressional intent when it is otherwise difficult to ascertain.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Wlny-Tv, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
(2×)
a committee report, representing a collective statement by the drafters about the intended purpose of proposed legislation, is considered a particularly good indicator of congressional intent when it is otherwise difficult to ascertain.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. Neztsosie
(2×)
party must exhaust tribal court remedies before a federal district court may entertain a challenge to tribal jurisdiction.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
El Paso Natural Gas Company, a Delaware Corporation v. Laura Neztsosie Arlinda Neztsosie, Cyprus Foote Mineral Company, a Pennsylvania Corporation Cyprus Amax Mineral Company, a Delaware Corporation v. Zonnie Marie Dandy Richards, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Harold J. Richards, Sr.
(2×)
party must exhaust tribal court remedies before a federal district court may entertain a challenge to tribal jurisdiction.
discussed
Cited "see"
State of Montana Department of Transportation v. King
(2×)
See Yellowstone County v. Pease, 96 F.3d 1169, 1176 (9th Cir.1996) (holding that the Crow Allotment Act of 1920 did not create a consensual relationship between a tribe and a state), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1209 , 117 S.Ct. 1691 , 137 L.Ed.2d 818 (1997); see also County of Lewis v. Allen, 163 F.3d 509, 515 (9th Cir.1998) (en banc) (stating that Montana’s first exception was not meant to apply to “agreements between two governmental entities”).
discussed
Cited "see"
99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2432, 1999 Daily Journal D.A.R. 3174 State of Washington v. William M. Daley, United States Secretary of Commerce, Midwater Trawlers Co-Operative West Coast Seafood Processors Fisherman's Marketing Assoc. v. Department of Commerce, National Marine Fisheries Service, William M. Daley, United States Secretary of Commerce
(2×)
See Yellowstone County v. Pease, 96 F.3d 1169, 1172 (9th Cir.1996) (declining to advance to Rule 19(b) analysis upon concluding that absent Tribe is not a necessary party under Rule 19(a)), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1209 , 117 S.Ct. 1691 , 137 L.Ed.2d 818 (1997); see also Southwest Center, 150 F.3d at 1155 (reversing district court's determination that absent party was "necessary" and remanding without Rule 19(b) analysis).
discussed
Cited "see"
Washington v. Daley
(2×)
See Yellowstone County v. Pease, 96 F.3d 1169, 1172 (9th Cir.1996) (declining to advance to Rule 19(b) analysis upon concluding that absent Tribe is not a necessary party under Rule 19(a)), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1209 , 117 S.Ct. 1691 , 137 L.Ed.2d 818 (1997); see also Southwest Center, 150 F.3d at 1155 (reversing district court’s determination that absent party was “necessary” and remanding without Rule 19(b) analysis).
discussed
Cited "see"
Landmark Golf Ltd. Partnership v. Las Vegas Paiute Tribe
(2×)
See Yellowstone County v. Pease, 96 F.3d 1169, 1172 (9th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1209 , 117 S.Ct. 1691 , 137 L.Ed.2d 818 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1627, 1999 Daily Journal D.A.R. 2175 California Democratic Party Art Torres Kathy Bowler Paul Jorjorian Peace and Freedom Party C.T. Weber Libertarian Party of California Gail Lightfoot, and California Republican Party, Michael Schroeder Shawn Steel Donna Shalansky, Plaintiffs-Intervenors v. Bill Jones, Secretary of the State of California v. Californians for an Open Primary, Defendant-Intervenor- California Democratic Party Art Torres Kathy Bowler Paul Jorjorian Peace and Freedom Party C.T. Weber Libertarian Party of California Gail Lightfoot, and California Republican Party, Michael Schroeder Shawn Steel Donna Shalansky, Plaintiffs-Intervenors v. Bill Jones, Secretary of the State of California
See O'Callaghan v. Alaska, 914 P.2d 1250 (Alaska 1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1209 , 117 S.Ct. 1690 , 137 L.Ed.2d 818 (1997); Heavey v. Chapman, 93 Wash.2d 700 , 611 P.2d 1256 (1980); Anderson v. Millikin, 186 Wash. 602 , 59 P.2d 295 (1936).
discussed
Cited "see"
California Democratic Party v. Jones
See O’Callaghan v. Alaska, 914 P.2d 1250 (Alaska 1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1209 , 117 S.Ct. 1690 , 137 L.Ed.2d 818 (1997); Heavey v. Chapman, 93 Wash.2d 700 , 611 P.2d 1256 (1980); Anderson v. Millikin, 186 Wash. 602 , 59 P.2d 295 (1936).
discussed
Cited "see"
Walker Stone Company, Inc. v. The Secretary of Labor Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
(2×)
See Joy Techs., Inc. v. Secretary of Labor, 99 F.3d 991, 996-97 (10th Cir.1996) (interpreting regulation to further safety promoting purposes of the Mine Act and noting that the Mine Act should be liberally construed to accomplish its remedial purposes), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S. Ct. 1691 , 137 L.Ed.2d 818 (1997); see also RNS Servs., Inc. v. Secretary of Labor, 115 F.3d 182, 187 (3d Cir.1997) (noting remedial legislation, such as the Mine Act, should be broadly construed to effectuate its purposes).
discussed
Cited "see"
1998 O.S.H.D. (Cch) P 31,624, 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6244, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8649 D.H. Blattner & Sons, Inc. v. Secretary of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration, and Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
(2×)
See Joy Techs., Inc. v. Secretary of Labor, 99 F.3d 991, 999 (10th Cir.1996), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 1691 , 137 L.Ed.2d 818 (1997); Otis Elevator Co. v. Secretary of Labor, 921 F.2d 1285, 1290 (D.C.Cir.1990). 14 The Mine Act defines an "operator" as "any owner, lessee, or other person who operates, controls, or supervises a coal or other mine or any independent contractor performing services or construction at such mine." 30 U.S.C. § 802 (d).
discussed
Cited "see"
D.H. Blattner & Sons, Inc. v. Secretary of Labor, Mine Safety & Health Administration
(2×)
See Joy Techs., Inc. v. Secretary of Labor, 99 F.3d 991, 999 (10th Cir.1996), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 1691 , 137 L.Ed.2d 818 (1997); Otis Elevator Co. v. Secretary of Labor, 921 F.2d 1285, 1290 (D.C.Cir.1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
California Democratic Party v. Jones
See O’Callaghan v. Alaska, 914 P.2d 1250 (Alaska 1996), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 1690 , 137 L.Ed.2d 818 (1997); Heavey v. Chapman, 93 Wash.2d 700 , 611 P.2d 1256 (1980); Anderson v. Millikin, 186 Wash. 602 , 59 P.2d 295 (1936).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
FINALCO, INC.
v.
Theodore Steven ROOSEVELT
v.
Theodore Steven ROOSEVELT
No. 96-1183.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 12, 1997.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Second Circuit (4) · Ninth Circuit (4)
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.