green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
2.3 score
“a mere scintilla of evidence in support of the nonmovant's position will not defeat a motion for summary judgment.”
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Zhang v. Science & Technology Corp.
a mere scintilla of evidence in support of the nonmovant's position will not defeat a motion for summary judgment.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bailey v. Household Finance Corp. (In Re Bailey)
See Detrick v. Panalpina, Inc., 108 F.3d 529 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 810 , 118 S.Ct. 52 , 139 L.Ed.2d 17 (1997); Bauer v. Commerce Union Bank, 859 F.2d 438, 440-41 (6th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1079 , 109 S.Ct. 1531 , 103 L.Ed.2d 836 (1989); Jones v. Harrell, 858 F.2d 667, 669 (11th Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ideal Instruments, Inc. v. Rivard Instruments, Inc.
Ideal is also correct that a corporate officer can be held liable for tortious conduct that he personally or intentionally commits, see Haupt v. Miller, 514 N.W.2d 905, 909 (Iowa 1994) (corporate officers can be held liable for negligence if they take part personally in the commission of the tort against a third party); Grefe v. Ross, 231 N.W.2d 863, 868 (Iowa 1975) (corporate officers are individually liable for torts that they commit while acting within as well as outside the scope of their employment), and defamation is an “intentional tort.” See Laturence v. Grinde, 534 N.W.2d 414, 419…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mullinax v. Radian Guaranty Inc.
Supermarket of Marlinton, Inc. v. Meadow Gold Dairies, Inc., 71 F.3d 119, 123 (4th Cir.1995); see also Detrick v. Panalpina, Inc., 108 F.3d 529, 541 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 810 , 118 S.Ct. 52 , 139 L.Ed.2d 17 (1997).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Deanna L. Beard, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Flying J, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee, and Richard Krout
Iowa Code §§ 85.20 , 85.20(1); see also Wilson v. IBP, Inc., 558 N.W.2d 132, 137 (Iowa 1996), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 810 , 118 S.Ct. 52 , 139 L.Ed.2d 17 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Right to Life of Michigan, Inc. v. Miller
See also Maine Right to Life Committee, Inc. v. Federal Election Com’n, 914 F.Supp. 8, 12 (D.Me.) (“What the Supreme Court did was draw a bright line that may err on the side of permitting things that affect the election process, but at all costs avoids restricting, in any way, discussion of public issues.”), aff’d, 98 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 1996), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 118 S.Ct. 52 , 139 L.Ed.2d 17 (1997); Federal Election Com’n v. Christian Action Network, 894 F.Supp. 946, 953 (W.D.Va.1995) (“Without a frank admonition to take electoral action, even admittedly negative advertisem…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Doe
v.
Massachusetts Department of Social Services
v.
Massachusetts Department of Social Services
No. 96-1819.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1997.
Published
Citer courts: D. Maryland (1)
Sup. Jud. Ct. Mass. Certiorari denied.