green
Positive treatment
2.3 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
DiRienzo v. Philip Services Corp.
See Europe & Overseas Commodity Traders, S.A. v. Banque Paribas London, 147 F.3d 118, 127-29 (2d Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1139 , 119 S.Ct. 1029 , 143 L.Ed.2d 39 (1999); Bersch v. Drexel Firestone, Inc., 519 F.2d 974, 993 (2d Cir.1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Philip Services Corp. Securities Litigation
See Bersch v. Drexel Firestone, Inc., 519 F.2d 974, 993 (2d Cir.1975) (“[T]he anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws ... [d]o not apply to losses from sales of securities to foreigners outside the United States unless acts (or culpable failures to act) within the United States directly caused such losses.” (emphasis added)); accord Europe & Overseas Commodity Traders, S.A. v. Banque Paribas London, 147 F.3d 118, 127-29 (2d Cir.1998) (“[A]c-tivity in the United States that is ‘merely preparatory’ to a securities fraud elsewhere will not implicate our antifraud laws.”),…
discussed
Cited "see"
CCL Service Corp. v. United States
See NEC Corp. v. United States, 151 F.3d 1361, 1369 (Fed.Cir.1998), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 1029 , 143 L.Ed.2d 39 (1999); Laningham v. United States, 30 Fed.Cl. 296, 309 (1994), appeal dismissed, 52 F.3d 344 (1995) (Table); see also Intrepid v. Pollock, 907 F.2d 1125, 1131 (Fed.Cir.1990) (discussing what constitutes “controversy”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Europe and Overseas Commodity Traders, S. A.
v.
Banque Paribas London and Banque Paribas London v. Europe and Overseas Commodity Traders, S. A.
v.
Banque Paribas London and Banque Paribas London v. Europe and Overseas Commodity Traders, S. A.
No. 98-723; No. 98-923.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1999.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 147 F. 3d 118.