green
Positive treatment
3.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James Charles Poe, III
See United States v. Kehoe, 310 F.3d 579, 590 (8th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 1048 , 123 S.Ct. 2112 , 155 L.Ed.2d 1089 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Keith Bernard Crenshaw, United States of America v. Kamil Hakeem Johnson, United States of America v. Timothy Kevin McGruder
See United States v. Kehoe, 310 F.Sd 579, 588 (8th Cir.2002) (upholding § 1959 against Tenth Amendment challenge and explaining, “RICO criminalizes the furthering of the enterprise, not the predicate acts.”) (internal quotation marks omitted), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 123 S.Ct. 2112 , 155 L.Ed.2d 1089 (2003); S.Rep.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Twilegar v. State
See Nelson v. State, 748 So.2d 237 (Fla.1999); see also United States v. Kehoe, 310 F.3d 579, 590-91 (8th Cir.2002) (holding that the Confrontation Clause did not guarantee the defendant the right to cross-examine a speaker whose statements were imputed to the defendant as adoptive admissions of a party opponent), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 1048 , 123 S.Ct. 2112 , 155 L.Ed.2d 1089 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Clark
To indicate adoption, it must appear that the party heard the statement, the matter was within his or her knowledge, and, "perhaps most importantly," "the occasion and nature of the statement [were] such that the party would likely have replied if he did not mean to accept what was said." Id. (omitted); see also U.S. v. Kehoe, 310 F.3d 579, 591 (8th Cir.2002), cert. den., 538 U.S. 1048 , 123 S.Ct. 2112 , 155 L.Ed.2d 1089 (2003) (for an out-of-court statement to constitute an adopted admission under FRE 801(d)(2)(B), the defendant must have been present when the statement was made, have underst…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Globe v. State
See Nelson v. State, 748 So.2d 237 (Fla.1999); see also United States v. Kehoe, 310 F.3d 579, 590-91 (8th Cir. 2002) (holding that the Confrontation Clause did not guarantee the defendant the right to cross-examine a speaker whose statements *673 were imputed to the defendant as adoptive admissions of a party opponent), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 1048 , 123 S.Ct. 2112 , 155 L.Ed.2d 1089 (2003).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Smallwood
v.
United States
v.
United States
02-10097.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 19, 2003.
Published
SMALLWOOD
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 02-10097.
Supreme Court of United States.
May 19, 2003.
1
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT.
2
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 54 Fed. Appx. 399.