green
Positive treatment
1.7 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District, No. 1
See, e.g., Cotter v. City of Boston, 323 F.3d 160, 171 (1st Cir.) (“The necessity for relief was great, but the means chosen by the Department were modest — only three African-American officers were promoted out of rank — indicating narrow tailoring.”), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 124 S.Ct. 179 , 157 L.Ed.2d 47 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Parents Involved In Community Schools v. Seattle School District
See, e.g., Cotter v. City of Boston, 323 F.3d 160, 171 (1st Cir.) ("The necessity for relief was great, but the means chosen by the Department were modest — only three African-American officers were promoted out of rank — indicating narrow tailoring."), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 124 S.Ct. 179 , 157 L.Ed.2d 47 (2003). 226 Because strict scrutiny is not meant to be "fatal in fact," Grutter, 539 U.S. at 326 , 123 S.Ct. 2325 , I would hold that the District's modest measures, which were enacted to decrease the intrusiveness and burden of its assignment policy, do not cause its Plan to become…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Johnson v. Lyle
See Shwarz, 234 F.3d at 434 ; see also Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Rossotti, 317 F.3d 401, 410 (4th Cir.) ("It would be difficult to conceive of a more comprehensive statutory scheme, or one that has received more intense scrutiny from Congress, than the Internal Revenue Code."), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 825 , 124 S.Ct. 179 , 157 L.Ed.2d 47 (2003).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Judicial Watch, Inc.
v.
Rossotti
v.
Rossotti
02-1849.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 2003.
Published
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC.
v.
ROSSOTTI ET AL.
No. 02-1849.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 6, 2003.
1
Appeal from the C. A. 4th Cir.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 317 F. 3d 401.