green
Positive treatment
2.5 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Andria Priestley v. Michael Astrue
See id. at 1181 n. 6 (acknowledging that "[ajlthough the record does not indicate that the [District of Arizona] amended [its local rule to require admission to the state bar of Arizona as a requirement for admission to the federal bar] for the explicit purpose of ensuring quality attorney representation, it is well-established that rational basis scrutiny permits the court to consider any conceivable justifications for enacting the law”) (alterations and citation omitted; emphasis in original).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Contract Management Services, Inc.
v.
Travel Nurses International, Inc
v.
Travel Nurses International, Inc
03-1355.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 1, 2004.
Published
CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., ET AL.
v.
TRAVEL NURSES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
No. 03-1355.
Supreme Court of United States.
June 1, 2004.
1
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 83 Fed. Appx. 978.