Underwood v. Dretke, Dir., Texas Dep't of Crim. Just., Corr. Institutions Div., 543 U.S. 821 (2004). · Go Syfert
Underwood v. Dretke, Dir., Texas Dep't of Crim. Just., Corr. Institutions Div., 543 U.S. 821 (2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
27 citation events (27 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Commonwealth v. Hitcho, G., Aplt. (pa, 2015-09-29)
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Hitcho, G., Aplt.
Pa. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pressley, supra. This Court abolished the relaxed waiver doctrine in capital direct appeals filed after the date of our decision in Commonwealth v. Freeman, 573 Pa. 532 , 827 A.2d 385 (2003), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 822 , 125 S.Ct. 30 , 160 L.Ed.2d 31 (2004).
discussed Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Brown (2×)
Pa. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Freeman, 573 Pa. 532 , 827 A.2d 385 (2003), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 125 S.Ct. 30 , 160 L.Ed.2d 31 (2004). [3] The Majority would distinguish these cases on the ground that the competency issue allegedly was presented in them only in the guise of ineffective assistance of counsel.
discussed Cited "see" Aguayo v. Universal Instruments Corp.
S.D. Tex. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Microsoft Corp. v. Multi-Tech Sys., Inc., 357 F.3d 1340, 1348 (Fed.Cir.) ("Those statements, some of which are found in the ‘Summary of the Invention' portion of the specification, are not limited to describing a preferred embodiment, but more broadly describe the overall inventions of all three patents.”), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 61 , 160 L.Ed.2d 31 (2004). 75 .
discussed Cited "see" C.R. Bard, Inc. And Davol Inc. v. United States Surgical Corp.
Fed. Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Microsoft Corp. v. Multi-Tech Sys., Inc., 357 F.3d 1340, 1348 (Fed.Cir.) (“Those statements, some of which are found in the ‘Summary of the Invention’ portion of the specification, are not limited to describing a preferred embodiment, but more broadly describe the overall inventions of all three patents.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 61 , 160 L.Ed.2d 31 (2004).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Law Office of Douglas T. Harris v. Philadelphia Waterfront Partners, LP (2×)
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see also · confidence low
The failure to assert a privilege constitutes a waiver thereof."); Kelley v. Mueller, 590 Pa. 91 , 912 A.2d 202, 203-204 (2006) (per curiam) (applying Rule 302(a) and reversing this Court's decision to analyze, inter alia, a constitutional challenge which had not been raised in the trial court); Commonwealth v. Clair, 458 Pa. 418 , 326 A.2d 272, 274 (1974) (adopting the waiver doctrine, as of yet to be codified in Rule 302(a), for criminal proceedings and refusing to review constitutional claims which were not raised before the trial court); see also Commonwealth v. Freeman, 573 Pa. 532 , 827 …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United Magazines Co. v. Murdoch Magazines Distribution, Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 2004 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Lewis v. Philip Morris Inc., 355 F.3d 515, 528 (6th Cir.) (“Absent any indication in the record that Philip Morris ‘actually controlled’ the terms of sale by wholesalers to vendors, [we must] affirm the district court’s summary judgment regarding section 2(a) claims brought by vendors who purchase through wholesalers.”), cer t. denied, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 61 , 160 L.Ed.2d 31 (2004); cf. Purolator Products, Inc. v. FTC, 352 F.2d 874, 883 (7th Cir.1965) (“If the seller controls the sale, he is responsible for the discrimination in the sale price, if there is such discrimin…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Underwood
v.
Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
03-1720.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 2004.
543 U.S. 821
Published

543 U.S. 821

UNDERWOOD
v.
DRETKE, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION.

No. 03-1720.

Supreme Court of United States.

October 4, 2004.

1

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.