Namer v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 544 U.S. 904 (2005). · Go Syfert
Search
Namer v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 544 U.S. 904 (2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“e have allowed restitution for the limited purpose of returning the acquiring thrift to the status quo ante when specific initial contributions to an acquired thrift have been established.”
12 citation events (12 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Hughes v. United States (uscfc, 2006-06-09)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Hughes v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2006 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
e have allowed restitution for the limited purpose of returning the acquiring thrift to the status quo ante when specific initial contributions to an acquired thrift have been established.
cited Cited "see" Miller v. Johnson
E.D. Va. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Barbour v. WMATA, 374 F.3d 1161 (D.C.Cir.2004), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 904 , 125 S.Ct. 1591 , 161 L.Ed.2d 277 (2005); Pace v. Bogalusa City Sch.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Namer
v.
Federal Trade Commission
04-602.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 7, 2005.
544 U.S. 904
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 60%
Citer courts: Federal Claims (1)

544 U.S. 904

NAMER ET AL.
v.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION.

No. 04-602.

Supreme Court of United States.

March 7, 2005.

1

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 376 F. 3d 317.