green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Bennett v. BUSINELLE TOWING CORPORATION
See Scarborough v. Clemco Industries, 391 F.3d 660, 668 (5 Cir. 2004), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 999 , 125 S.Ct. 1932 , 161 L.Ed.2d 772 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gildor v. United States Postal Service
The FTCA expressly retains sovereign immunity for “[a]ny claim arising out of the loss, miscarriage, or negligent transmission of letters or postal matter.” 28 U.S.C. § 2680 (b); see Dolan v. United States Postal Serv., 377 F.3d 285 (3d Cir.2004), cert. granted, - U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 1928 , 161 L.Ed.2d 772 (2005); Raila v. United States, 355 F.3d 118, 120-21 (2d Cir.2004); Marine Ins.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Loftin v. Kirby Inland Marine, L.P.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, however, retreated from this position in Guevara, holding that “[developments in the law ... have caused us to reevaluate the basis for such a punitive award and to conclude that Holmes should be overruled .... [W]e are persuaded that punitive damages should no longer be available in cases of willful nonpayment of maintenance and cure under the general maritime law.” 59 F.3d at 1498, 1513; see also Scarborough v. Clemco Indus., 391 F.3d 660, 668 (5th Cir.2004), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 999 , 125 S.Ct. 1932 , 161 L.Ed.2d 772 (2005); Ga…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gable v. State
See, e.g., State v. Guzek, 336 Or 424, 429 , 86 P3d 1106 (2004), cert granted, 544 US 998 , 125 S Ct 1929 , 161 L Ed 2d 772 (2005) (a defendant who committed his crimes *730 in 1987 chose to have jury instructed on “true life” option); see also Langley, 331 Or at 438-40 ; State v. Rogers, 330 Or 282, 290-91 , 4 P3d 1261 (2000); McDonnell, 329 Or at 388-92 . 8 The state disputes petitioner’s assumption in that regard and contends that, even if petitioner were to secure post-conviction relief, the jury in a new penalty-phase proceeding would not be so limited.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Domino's Pizza, Inc.
v.
McDonald
v.
McDonald
04-593.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 25, 2005.
Published
DOMINO'S PIZZA, INC., ET AL.
v.
McDONALD.
No. 04-593.
Supreme Court of United States.
April 25, 2005.
1
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted. Reported below: 107 Fed. Appx. 18.