green
Positive treatment
4.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Call v. Clarke
See Hughes v. Dretke, 412 F.3d 582, 596 (5th Cir.2005) (applying Stone to bar Fourth Amendment claim on habeas review of state court proceedings where the Fourth Amendment claim was fully and fairly litigated), cert denied, 546 U.S. 1177 , 126 S.Ct. 1347 , 164 L.Ed.2d 60 (2006); Foltz v. Clarke, No. 3:13CV627, 2014 WL 4202482 , at *4 (E.D.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bartee v. Quarterman
See Hughes v. Dretke, 412 F.3d 582, 594-95 (5th Cir.2005) (holding petitioner procedurally defaulted on a jury misconduct claim by presenting the state courts with purely state-law arguments supporting same and waiting until he reached federal court to first urge federal constitutional arguments), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1177 , 126 S.Ct. 1347 , 164 L.Ed.2d 60 (2006); Beazley v. Johnson, 242 F.3d 248, 264-68 (5th Cir.) (holding petitioner procedurally defaulted on a claim by failing to present same to the Texas Court of criminal Appeals either on direct appeal or in a state habeas corpus applica…
discussed
Cited "see"
Berkley v. Quarterman
See Hughes v. Dretke, 412 F.3d 582, 594-95 (5th Cir.2005) (holding petitioner procedurally defaulted on a jury misconduct claim by presenting the state courts with purely state-law arguments supporting same and waiting until he reached federal court to first urge federal constitutional arguments), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1177 , 126 S.Ct. 1347 , 164 L.Ed.2d 60 (2006); Beazley v. Johnson, 242 F.3d 248, 264-68 (5th Cir.2001) (holding petitioner procedurally defaulted on a claim by failing to present same to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals either on direct appeal or in a state habeas corpus app…
discussed
Cited "see"
Blanton v. Quarterman
(2×)
See Hughes v. Dretke, 412 F.3d 582, 593-94 (5th Cir.2005)(holding same arguments underlying petitioner’s eighth claim herein were so legally insubstantial as to be unworthy of a certificate of appealability), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 1347 , 164 L.Ed.2d 60 (2006); Alexander v. Johnson, 211 F.3d 895, 897-98 (5th Cir.2000)(holding the Teague v. Lane non-retroactivity doctrine precluded applying such a rule in a federal habeas context); Davis v. Scott, 51 F.Sd 457, 466-67 (5th Cir.1995)(holding the same), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 992 , 116 S.Ct. 525 , 133 L.Ed.2d 432 (1995); Jacobs v. S…
discussed
Cited "see"
Martinez v. Dretke
See Hughes v. Dret ke, 412 F.3d 582, 592 (5th Cir.2005) (holding the rule in Simmons applies only where state law provides for life imprisonment without possibility of parole), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 126 S.Ct. 1347 , 164 L.Ed.2d 60 (2006) (No. 05-7107); Cardenas v. Dretke, 405 F.3d 244, 250 (5th Cir.2005) (recognizing the Supreme Court’s Ramdass opinion clarified the rule limiting the applicability of the Simmons rule to only those jurisdictions where a convicted capital murderer is ineligible for parole), petition for cert. filed, (U.S. July 12, 2005) (No. 05-5304); Thacker v. Dretke, …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Garza v. Thaler
See, e.g., Hughes v. Dretke, 412 F.3d 582, 593-94 (5th Cir.2005) (holding the same arguments underlying petitioner’s eighth claim herein were so legally insubstantial as to be unworthy of a certificate of appealability), ce rt. denied, 546 U.S. 1177 , 126 S.Ct. 1347 , 164 L.Ed.2d 60 (2006); Alexander v. Johnson, 211 F.3d 895, 897-98 (5th Cir. 2000) (holding the Teague v. Lane nonretroactivity doctrine precluded applying such a rule in a federal habeas context); Davis v. Scott, 51 F.3d 457, 466-67 (5th Cir.1995) (holding the same), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 992 , 116 S.Ct. 525 , 133 L.Ed.2d 432 …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Reynolds v. State
See also Flowers v. State, 922 So.2d 938, 953-54 (Ala.Crim.App.2005.), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1177 , 126 S.Ct. 1347 , 164 L.Ed.2d 60 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Moore v. Quarterman
See, e.g., Hughes v. Dretke, 412 F.3d 582, 593-94 (5th Cir.2005)(holding the same arguments underlying petitioner’s nineteenth claim herein were so legally insubstantial as to be unworthy of a certificate of appealability), cer t. denied, 546 U.S. 1177 , 126 S.Ct. 1347 , 164 L.Ed.2d 60 (2006); Alexander v. Johnson, 211 F.3d 895, 897-98 (5th Cir.2000)(holding the Teague v. Lane non-retroactivity doctrine precluded applying such a rule in a federal habeas context); Davis v. Scott, 51 F.3d 457, 466-67 (5th Cir.1995)(holding the same), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 992 , 116 S.Ct. 525 , 133 L.Ed.2d 432…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wrice
v.
Pierce, Warden
v.
Pierce, Warden
No. 05-6895.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 21, 2006.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.