Martin v. United States, 385 U.S. 1008 (1967). · Go Syfert
Search
Martin v. United States, 385 U.S. 1008 (1967). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“the occasion for facing such a possibility ought not to be forced until it is inescapably necessary”
91 citation events across 31 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Industrial Communications Systems, Inc. v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. (ca9, 1974-10-04)
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967 1996 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Industrial Communications Systems, Inc. v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.
9th Cir. · 1974 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the occasion for facing such a possibility ought not to be forced until it is inescapably necessary
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Industrial Communications Systems, Inc. v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Company
9th Cir. · 1974 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the occasion for facing such a possibility ought not to be forced until it is inescapably necessary
discussed Cited "see" Centel Communications Co. v. Commissioner (2×)
Tax Ct. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Carter v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company , 365 F.2d 486 (5th Cir. 1966) , cert. denied 385 U.S. 1008 ↩ (1967) . 4.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. McKenzie
5th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Carter v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 365 F.2d 486, 488-89 (5th Cir.1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1008 , 87 S.Ct. 714 , 17 L.Ed.2d 546 (1967) (where an order not itself appealable served as "the reason” for an appealable injunctive order, this Court reviewed the underlying order as part and parcel of the appealable order).
discussed Cited "see" ca5 1984
5th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Carter v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 365 F.2d 486, 488-89 (5th Cir.1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1008 , 87 S.Ct. 714 , 17 L.Ed.2d 546 (1967) (where an order not itself appealable served as "the reason" for an appealable injunctive order, this Court reviewed the underlying order as part and parcel of the appealable order).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Burdick v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.
Kan. Ct. App. · 1984 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Carter v. American Telephone & Telegraph Company, 365 F.2d 486 (5th Cir. 1966), cert. denied 385 U.S. 1008 (1967). .We then face the issue of the reasonableness of the tariff and upon whom that determination falls.
Martin
v.
United States
No. 770.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 9, 1967.
385 U.S. 1008
Edward Bennett Williams and Robert L. Weinberg for petitioner., Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Published
1 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 75%
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (2)

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.