green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.0 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“[T]he Second Circuit rejects the notion that the ‘quo’ in a quid pro quo must be a narrowly defined official act.”
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Ryan v. United States
he second circuit rejects the notion that the 'quo' in a quid pro quo must be a narrowly defined official act.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Milovanovic
(2×)
See United States v. Urciuoli, 613 F.3d 11, 17-18 (1st Cir.) (“[NJothing in Skilling’s language or context suggests that the Court was distinguishing between the fiduciary who received the bribe and the non-fiduciary who gave it, a distinction that would conflict with the statute’s language embracing those who participate in ‘any scheme ... to defraud.’ ” (alteration in original) (citing 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 , 1341), cert. denied , — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 612 , 178 L.Ed.2d 436 (2010)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Zhen Zhou Wu
Compare Burks v. United States, 437 U.S. 1, 11 , 98 S.Ct. 2141 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1 (1978) (retrial barred by Double Jeopardy Clause if evidence supplied by the government would be legally insufficient to sustain conviction), with United States v. Urciuoli, 513 F.3d 290, 297 (1st Cir.2008) (new trial permissible where error is confined to jury instructions), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 612 , 178 L.Ed.2d 436 (2010).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Anjum Malik
v.
Continental Airlines, Inc.
v.
Continental Airlines, Inc.
No. 10-351.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 15, 2010.
178 L. Ed. 2d 436
Published
Citer courts: N.D. Illinois (1)
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Same case below, 369 Fed. Appx. 588.