Wardell v. United States, 181 L. Ed. 2d 280 (2011). · Go Syfert
Search
Wardell v. United States, 181 L. Ed. 2d 280 (2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
11 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Dino Kyzar v. Charles Ryan (ca9, 2015-03-12)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Dino Kyzar v. Charles Ryan
9th Cir. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kyzar v. Ryan, 430 Fed.Appx. 630 (9th Cir.2011), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 431 , 181 L.Ed.2d 280 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Douglas C.
Conn. · 2023 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Jodi D., 340 Conn. 463 , 476, 264 A.3d 509 (2021) (constitutional issue presents legal question subject to de novo review); see also United States v. Newell, 658 F.3d 1, 20 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 565 U.S. 955 , 132 S. Ct. 430 , 181 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Douglas C.
Conn. · 2022 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Jodi D., 340 Conn. 463 , 476, 264 A.3d 509 (2021) (constitutional issue presents legal question sub- ject to de novo review); see also United States v. Newell, 658 F.3d 1, 20 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 565 U.S. 955 , 132 S. Ct. 430 , 181 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Irving (2×)
10th Cir. · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence low
Furthermore, when a rule of law has been decided adversely to one or more codefendants, the law of the case doctrine precludes all other codefendants from relitigating the legal issue" (citation omitted) (quoting Alvarez, 142 F.3d at 1247 ; United States v. Aramony, 166 F.3d 655, 661 (4th Cir. 1999)) (internal quotation marks omitted)); see also United States v. Wardell, 591 F.3d 1279 , 1306 n. 16 (10th Cir.2009) ("Our analysis and rulings in [Mr. Wardell's codefendant's case] apply with full force to Mr. Wardell's arguments and are law of the case"), cert. *1193 denied, ___ U.S. ___, 132 S.Ct…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wendel R. Wardell, Jr.
v.
United States
No. 11-6149.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 11, 2011.
181 L. Ed. 2d 280
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 591 F.3d 1279.