discussed Cited "see" United States v. Jeffers See United States v. Vandebrake, 771 F.Supp.2d 961 (N.D.Iowa 2011) (rejecting, on policy grounds, the relatively lenient treatment of antitrust violators in the Sentencing Guidelines, as compared to defendants sentenced for fraud, and imposing a sentence on an antitrust defendant of 48 months, rather than a sentence in the guidelines range of 21 to 27 months), aff'd, 679 F.3d 1030 (8th Cir.2012), ce rt. denied, - U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 1457 , 185 L.Ed.2d 362 (2013); United States v. Foy, 646 F.Supp.2d 1055 (N.D.Iowa 2009) (varying upward from an advisory sentencing guidelines range of 210 to 262 mo…

discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Alejandro Umana See, e.g., United States v. Danielczyk, 683 F.3d 611, 615 (4th Cir.2012) (“Thus, lower courts should not conclude that the Supreme Court’s ‘more recent cases have, by implication, overruled [its] earlier precedent.’ ” (alteration in original) (quoting Agostini v. Felton, 521 U.S. 203, 237 , 117 S.Ct. 1997 , 138 L.Ed.2d 391 (1997))), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 133 S.Ct. 1459 , 185 L.Ed.2d 362 (2013).