Janes v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Auth., 136 S. Ct. 80 (2015). · Go Syfert
Janes v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Auth., 136 S. Ct. 80 (2015). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“reisemur discloses a disk or plate shaped heat sink which cannot be considered to be elongated”
11 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Ge Lighting Solutions, LLC v. Lights of America, Inc. (cafc, 2016-10-27)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Ge Lighting Solutions, LLC v. Lights of America, Inc.
Fed. Cir. · 2016 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
reisemur discloses a disk or plate shaped heat sink which cannot be considered to be elongated
cited Cited "see" In re Camp Lejeune North Carolina Water Contamination Litigation
N.D. Ga. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See — U.S. -, 136 S.Ct. 71 , 193 L.Ed.2d 207 (2015). .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Szemple v. University of Medicine & Dentistry
D.N.J. · 2016 · signal: see also · confidence low
Bradford & Co., 198 F.3d 394, 402 (3d Cir.1999) (quoting Garcia v. U.S., 469 U.S. 70, 75 , 105 S.Ct. 479 , 83 L.Ed.2d 472 (1984)); see also Thorpe v. Borough of Thorpe, 770 F.3d 255, 263 (3d Cir.2014), cert. denied, - U.S.-, 136 S.Ct. 84 , 193 L.Ed.2d 207 (2015) (denying family members’ application for reinterment, holding that broad definition of “museum” in statute concerning return of plundered Native American cultural items will not be applied to include the borough of Jim Thorpe, PA, or the grave where the athlete’s remains were buried in accordance with his wife’s wishes).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Riva JANES
v.
TRIBOROUGH BRIDGE AND TUNNEL AUTHORITY
No. 14–1400..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 2015.
136 S. Ct. 80
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Consideration, Took.
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 83%
Citer courts: Federal Circuit (1)
Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.