discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Winters v. Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc. implicit in the inquiry is recognition that not every victim of an antitrust violation needs to be compensated under the antitrust laws in order for the antitrust laws to be efficiently enforced.

discussed Cited "see" United States v. Bain See United States v. Serrano-Mercado, 784 F.3d 838, 846-49 (1st Cir. 2015), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 137 S.Ct. 812 , 196 L.Ed.2d 599 (2017). 19 This case presents a. related issue of first impression: What do we do on plain error review when state law lacks clarity on the question of divisibility and the record lacks the Shepard documents to which we might otherwise refer in an attempt to resolve that ambiguity?

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Tremont Public Advisors, LLC v. Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority Even a plaintiff that has suffered an antitrust injury must also demonstrate that it is a suitable plaintiff, i.e., an efficient enforcer of the antitrust laws.’’ (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., 157–58; see also Gelboim v. Bank of America Corp., 823 F.3d 759, 770 (2d Cir. 2016) (‘‘[a]n antitrust plaintiff must show both constitutional standing and antitrust stand- ing’’), cert. denied, U.S. , 137 S. Ct. 814 , 196 L.