Lindsey v. Virginia, 138 S. Ct. 554 (2017). · Go Syfert
Search
Lindsey v. Virginia, 138 S. Ct. 554 (2017). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“where the government not only fails to correct materially false testimony but also affirmatively capitalizes on it, the defendant's due process rights are violated despite the government's timely disclosure of evidence showing the falsity”
7 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Commonwealth v. Ware (mass, 2019-07-26)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Commonwealth v. Ware
Mass. · 2019 · signal: cf. · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
where the government not only fails to correct materially false testimony but also affirmatively capitalizes on it, the defendant's due process rights are violated despite the government's timely disclosure of evidence showing the falsity
cited Cited "see" Shandong Dongfang Bayley Wood Co. v. United States
Ct. Intl. Trade · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See id. ; Bayley Affiliation Qre Resp. at 3, PD 162, bar code 3540296-01 (Feb. 1, 2017).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Gomez v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. · 2020 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Stein, 846 F.3d 1135 , 1147–48 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, U.S. , 138 S. Ct. 556 , 199 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
James LINDSEY
v.
VIRGINIA.
No. 17–132..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 11, 2017.
138 S. Ct. 554
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 57%
Citer courts: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial… (1)

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.