green
Positive treatment
4.2 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Smith v. Mitchell P.
At the threshold, the majority appear to believe that McKeiver was partly decided as an “equal protection issue.” (Maj. opn., ante, p. 952.) In fact, McKeiver was based only on the “narrow but precise” due process issue. ( 403 U.S. at p. 530 [25 L.Ed.2d at p. 652].) Thus, while McKeiver might at most have disposed of appellant’s federal due process claim, the equal protection problem was never resolved.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John Ed Rodgers, No. 31026 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part. I
See United States v. Johns, 5 Cir. 1970, 421 F.2d 413, 415 , cert. denied, 397 U.S. 1041 , 90 S.Ct. 1362 , 25 L.Ed.2d 652 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John Ed Rodgers
See United States v. Johns, 5 Cir. 1970, 421 F.2d 413, 415 , cert. denied, 397 U.S. 1041 , 90 S.Ct. 1362 , 25 L.Ed.2d 652 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pacific Car & Foundry Co.
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 1275.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 20, 1970.
Thomas Todd for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Walters, and David English Carmack for the United States. Michael Waris, Jr., for Farm & Industrial Equipment Institute as amicus curiae in support of the petition.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.