green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.3 score
“cjonsent need not be express, but may be implied from the totality of circumstances attendant on a declaration of mistrial”
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 32 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. John M. Gantley
(2×)
cjonsent need not be express, but may be implied from the totality of circumstances attendant on a declaration of mistrial
discussed
Cited "see"
Ralph Rodney Earnest v. Donald Dorsey, Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
See United States v. Goldstein, 479 F.2d 1061, 1067 (2d Cir.) (consent was implied where defendants moved for a mistrial and failed to communicate their alleged change in position to the trial judge notwithstanding adequate opportunity to do so), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 873 , 94 S.Ct. 151 , 38 L.Ed.2d 113 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kenneth Maula v. Lloyd Freckleton, Warden of the Rikers Island Correctional Facility
See United States v. Goldstein, 479 F.2d 1061, 1067 (2d Cir.) (consent implied from “totality of circumstances” where defendants moved for mistrial two hours before court actually declared mistrial and failed to object to the mistrial when jury was discharged), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 873 , 94 S.Ct. 151 , 38 L.Ed.2d 113 (1973); Camden v. Circuit Court of Second Judicial Circuit, 892 F.2d 610 , 615 (7th Cir.1989) (consent can be inferred where defendant was afforded “minimal but adequate opportunity to object” while mistrial was being declared), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 921 , 110 S.Ct. 195…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wesley C. Paxson, Sr.
(2×)
See United States v. Simpson, 475 F.2d 934 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 873 , 94 S.Ct. 140 , 38 L.Ed.2d 91 (1973). 4 Whether or not Paxson is correct about the unavailability of the attorney-client privilege, it appears that the District Court properly held the documents to be protected by the work-product doctrine.
discussed
Cited "see"
Security And Law Enforcement Employees v. Carey
See Daughtery v. Harris, 476 F.2d 292, 294-95 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 872 , 94 S.Ct. 112 , 38 L.Ed.2d 91 (1973); Evans v. Moseley, 455 F.2d 1084, 1086 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 889 , 93 S.Ct. 160 , 34 L.Ed.2d 146 (1972); United States v. Kelley, 393 F.Supp. 755, 756-57 (W.D.Okla.1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Security & Law Enforcement Employees v. Carey
See Daughtery v. Harris, 476 F.2d 292, 294-95 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 872 , 94 S.Ct. 112 , 38 L.Ed.2d 91 (1973); Evans v. Moseley, 455 F.2d 1084, 1086 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 889 , 93 S.Ct. 160 , 34 L.Ed.2d 146 (1972); United States v. Kelley, 393 F.Supp. 755, 756-57 (W.D.Okla.1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hunt v. Polk County, Iowa
See Daughtery v. Harris, 476 F.2d 292 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 872 , 94 S.Ct. 112 , 38 L.Ed.2d 91 (1973) (strip search of federal penitentiary inmate prior to court appearance, to locate contraband which could threaten security of the transferring marshals or the court); Bell v. Manson, 427 F.Supp. 450 (D.Conn.1976) (strip search of pretrial detainees on return from court appearances and other outside visits); Hodges v. Klein, 412 F.Supp. 896 (D.N.J.1976) (strip searches of maximum security convicted prisoners when entering or leaving the institution and after contact visits with ou…
discussed
Cited "see"
James Edward Clayton v. Peter A. Douglas, Warden, Lexington Assessment and Reception Center
As we reiterated recently: The Supreme Court has made it clear that “lawful incarceration brings about the necessary withdrawal or limitation of many privileges and rights, a retraction *145 justified by the considerations underlying our penal system.” Pell v. Procunier, 417 U.S. 817, 822 [ 94 S.Ct. 2800, 2804 , 41 L.Ed.2d 495 ]; Accord, Jones v. North Carolina Prisoner’s Labor Union, 433 U.S. 119, 125 [ 97 S.Ct. 2532, 2537 , 53 L.Ed.2d 629 ]; See generally Daughtery v. Harris, 476 F.2d 292 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 872 [ 94 S.Ct. 112 , 38 L.Ed.2d 91 ].
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ralph Riegelsperger
(2×)
See Eagle Thunder v. United States, 477 F.2d 1326, 1328 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 873 , 94 S.Ct. 142 , 38 L.Ed.2d 92 (1973), permitting the presence of counsel to be taken into account when determining the nature and extent of inquiry to be made by the trial court before accepting a guilty plea. 39 The record reveals that the court assiduously ascertained that defendant Riegelsperger understood the proceedings, the possible consequences thereof, and, in fact, was guilty of the crime to which he pled.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ramos v. Lamm
However we need not decide this basic issue since the district court did not find, nor is it claimed by the plaintiffs, that prison officials are denying visitation entirely. 83 Assuming that such a right exists, the Supreme Court has made it clear that "lawful incarceration brings about the necessary withdrawal or limitation of many privileges and rights, a retraction justified by the considerations underlying our penal system." Pell v. Procunier, 417 U.S. 817, 822 , 94 S.Ct. 2800, 2804 , 41 L.Ed.2d 495 ; accord, Jones v. North Carolina Prisoners' Union, 433 U.S. 119, 125 , 97 S.Ct. 2532, 253…
discussed
Cited "see"
Ramos v. Lamm
Assuming that such a right exists, the Supreme Court has made it clear that “lawful incarceration brings about the necessary withdrawal or limitation of many privileges and rights, a retraction justified by the considerations underlying our penal system.” Pell v. Procunier, 417 U.S. 817, 822 , 94 S.Ct. 2800, 2804 , 41 L.Ed.2d 495 ; accord, Jones v. North Carolina Prisoners’ Union, 433 U.S. 119, 125 , 97 S.Ct. 2532, 2537 , 53 L.Ed.2d 629 ; See generally Daughtery v. Harris, 476 F.2d 292 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 872 , 94 S.Ct. 112 , 38 L.Ed.2d 91 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Victor Harvey Smith
(2×)
See United States v. Goldstein, 479 F.2d 1061, 1067 (2d Cir.) (defendants did not recant previously-denied motion for mistrial or raise any objection, despite opportunity to do so), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 873 , 94 S.Ct. 151 , 38 L.Ed.2d 113 (1973); Raslich v. Bannan, 273 F.2d 420 (6th Cir. 1959) (defendant and his attorney "acquiesced in, and in substantial effect consented to," mistrial); United States v. Gordy, 526 F.2d 631 , 635 n. 1 (5th Cir. 1976) (dictum) (failure to object may constitute consent); Adkins v. Smith, 205 So.2d 530, 531-32 (Fla.1967); People v. Ramirez, 27 Cal.App.3d 660, 6…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sherry Marie Lilly, United States of America v. Merrilyn M. Gallegos
(2×)
Accord, Daughtery v. Harris, 476 F.2d 292 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 872 , 94 S.Ct. 112 , 38 L.Ed.2d 91 (1973); Bell v. Manson, 427 F.Supp. 450 (D.Conn.1976); Hodges v. Klein, 412 F.Supp. 896 (D.N.J.1976); Penn El v. Riddle, 399 F.Supp. 1059 (E.D.Va.1975); cf. Frazier v. Ward, 426 F.Supp. 1354 (N.D.N.Y.1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jesse Lee Evans
(2×)
See Conte v. Cardwell, 475 F.2d 698 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 873 , 94 S.Ct. 134 , 38 L.Ed.2d 91 ; United States v. Haley, 417 F.2d 625 (4th Cir.); see also Nelson v. United States, 208 F.2d 211 (10th Cir.).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bell v. Manson
See Daugherty v. Harris, 476 F.2d 292 (10 Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 872 , 94 S.Ct. 112 , 38 L.Ed.2d 91 (1973) (rectal search of inmates at maximum security institution prior to court appearances); Hodges v. Klein, 412 F.Supp. 896 (D.N.J.1976) (rectal search of prison inmates upon leaving or entering the institution and following personal contact visits with other inmates or friends and relatives); Giampetruzzi v. Malcolm, 406 F.Supp. 836 (S.D.N.Y.1975) (strip search of pretrial' detainees after personal visits); Penn El v. Riddle, 399 F.Supp. 1059 (E.D.Va.1975) (body cavity search of inmat…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Odell Bennett
See Daugherty v. Harris, 476 F.2d 292 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 872 , 94 S.Ct. 112 , 38 L.Ed.2d 91 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Earnest Velarde
See United States v. Pitman, 475 F.2d 1335 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 873 , 94 S.Ct. 146 , 38 L.Ed.2d 92 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Love v. United States
See Eagle Thunder v. United States, 477 F.2d 1326 (8th Cir. 1973), cert. den., 414 U.S. 873 , 94 S.Ct. 142 , 38 L.Ed.2d 92 ; Stephen v. United States, 426 F.2d 257, 258 (5th Cir. 1970); Durant v. United States, 410 F.2d 689 (1st Cir. 1969); United States v. Myers, 451 F.2d 402 (9th Cir. 1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Americo Michel v. United States
See Eagle Thunder v. United States, 477 F.2d 1326, 1328 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 873 , 94 S.Ct. 142 , 38 L.Ed.2d 92 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Washington v. Jarvis
See, e.g., United States v. Goldstein, 479 F.2d 1061, 1067 (2d Cir.1973), ce rt. denied, 414 U.S. 873 , 94 S.Ct. 151 , 38 L.Ed.2d 113 (1973); United States v. Nichols, 977 F.2d 972, 974 (5th Cir.1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Allen v. Commonwealth
See also United States v. Puleo, 817 F.2d 702, 705 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 978 , 108 S.Ct. 491 , 98 L.Ed.2d 489 (1987) (holding that “consent ‘may always be implied from a totality of the circumstances attendant on the declaration of a mistrial’ ”) (quoting United States v. Goldstein, 479 F.2d 1061, 1067 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 873 , 94 S.Ct. 151 , 38 L.Ed.2d 113 (1973)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Williams v. State
See also Daughtery v. Harris, 476 F.2d 292, 294 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 872 , 94 S.Ct. 112 and 113, 38 L.Ed.2d 91 (1973) (strip search and rectal examination prior to court appearance approved).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hendrix v. Faulkner
See, e. g., Daughtery v. Harris, 476 F.2d 292 (10th Cir.), cert. en., 414 U.S. 872 , 94 S.Ct. 112 , 38 L.Ed.2d 91 (1973).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bono v. Saxbe
See, e.g., Daughtery v. Harris, 476 F.2d 292 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 872 , 94 S.Ct. 112 , 38 L.Ed.2d 91 (1973); Hodges v. Klein, 412 F.Supp. 986 (D.N.J.1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Aillon
See, e.g., United States v. Goldstein, 479 F.2d 1061, 1067 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 873 , 94 S. Ct. 151 , 38 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Braxton v. United States
See, e. g., United States v. Goldstein, 479 F.2d 1061 , 1066 n.9 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 873 , 94 S.Ct. 151 , 38 L.Ed.2d 113 (1973); 5A J.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sconiers v. Jarvis
It has been repeatedly stated that: “[T]he basic responsibility for the control and management of penal institutions, including the discipline, treatment and care of those confined, lies with the responsible administrative agency and is not subject to judicial review unless exercised in such a manner as to constitute clear abuse or caprice upon the part of prison officials.” Paniagua v. Moseley, 451 F.2d 228 (10th Cir. 1971); Marchesani v. McCune, 531 F.2d 459 (10th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 846 , 97 S.Ct. 127 , 50 L.Ed.2d 117 ; see also Daugherty v. Harris, 476 F.2d 292 (10th Cir…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harry Clardy v. Edward Levi, Attorney General of the United States, Respondents- Phillip L. Tucker v. Edward Levi, Attorney General of the United States, Respondents
See also Daughtery v. Harris, 476 F.2d 292 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 872 , 94 S.Ct. 112 , 38 L.Ed.2d 91 (1973); Royal v. Clark, 447 F.2d 501 (5th Cir. 1971); Sullivan v. Ciccone, 311 F.Supp. 456 (W.D.Mo.1970); Lesser v. Humphrey, 89 F.Supp. 474 (M.D.Pa.1950).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Clardy v. Levi
See also Daughtery v. Harris, 476 F.2d 292 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 872 , 94 S.Ct. 112 , 38 L.Ed.2d 91 (1973); Royal v. Clark, 447 F.2d 501 (5th Cir. 1971); Sullivan v. Ciccone, 311 F.Supp. 456 (W.D.Mo.1970); Less er v. Humphrey, 89 F.Supp. 474 (M.D.Pa. 1950).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hearn v. Rhay
(2×)
Leathers v. United States, 250 F.2d 159, 165-166 (9th Cir. 1957); Himmelfarb v. United States, 175 F.2d 924, 938-939 (9th Cir. 1949), cert. denied 388 U.S. 860 , 70 S.Ct. 103 , 94 L.Ed. 527 (1949) ; McCormick, § 95 at 189-191; 8 Wigmore § 2311 at 599-603; see also, United States v. Simpson, 154 U.S.App.D.C. 350 , 475 F.2d 934, 936 (1973), cert. denied 414 U.S. 873 , 94 S.Ct. 140 , 38 L.Ed.2d 91 (1973); United States v. Blackburn, 446 F.2d 1089, 1091 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. denied 404 U.S. 1017 , 92 S. Ct. 679 , 30 L.Ed.2d 665 (1972); Wilcoxon v. United States, 231 F.2d 384, 385-386 (10th Cir.…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Penn El v. Riddle
See also Daughtery v. Harris, 476 F.2d 292 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 872 , 94 S.Ct. 112 , 38 L.Ed.2d 91 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brainard v. State
(2×)
Compare United States v. Cody, 438 F.2d 287, 288 (8 Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1010 , 93 S.Ct. 454 , 34 L.Ed.2d 303 (“The trial court must inquire directly of defendant as to his ‘understanding’ ”), with Eagle Thunder v. United States, 477 F.2d 1326 (8 Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 873 , 94 S.Ct. 142 , 38 L.Ed.2d 92 (where the charge was fully explained to a 33 year old defendant with three prior felony convictions, represented by counsel, the plea was properly taken despite failure to ask defendant if he understood the charge).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Conte
v.
Cardwell, Warden
v.
Cardwell, Warden
No. 72-6872.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1973.
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari.