green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.3 score
“preston i”
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Lynn E. Boughton v. Cotter Corporation Commonwealth Edison Company, Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company
But cf. In re Grand Jury Investigation of Ocean Transp., 604 F.2d 672 (D.C.Cir.) (appeal permitted but relief denied where documents had been inadvertently disclosed), cer t. denied, 444 U.S. 915 , 100 S.Ct. 229 , 62 L.Ed.2d 169 (1979).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Robert L. Preston v. United States
(3×)
also: Cited as authority (rule)
preston i
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Appley Brothers v. United States
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
Id. at 237-38.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States ex rel. Bagley v. TRW, Inc.
See Baxter Travenol Laboratories, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories, 117 F.R.D. 119, 121 (N.D.Ill.1987) (explaining that "[w]here pri- or to the assertion of the privilege, the documents have been examined and used by the opposing party, it may be unfair and unrealistic to uphold the privilege,” and holding that a waiver occurred where the receiving party repeatedly used and relied on the documents in its court filings) (citing In re Grand Jury Investigation of Ocean Transportation, 604 F.2d 672, 674-675 (D.C.Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 915 , 100 S.Ct. 229 , 62 L.Ed.2d 169 (1979)); Central D…
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Grand Jury Proceedings Subpoena to Testify To: Donald A. Wine, in Re Grand Jury Proceedings Subpoena to Testify To: Dale R. Luckow
See In re Grand Jury Investigation (Ocean Transp.), 196 U.S.App.D.C. 8 , 604 F.2d 672, 674 (per curiam), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 915 , 100 S.Ct. 229 , 62 L.Ed.2d 169 (1979). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Kolodney v. Old Colony Co-Operative Bank Newport National Bank (In Re Miracle Enterprises, Inc.)
See In re Grand Jury Investigation of Ocean Transportation, 604 F.2d 672, 675 (D.C.Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 915 , 100 S.Ct. 229 , 62 L.Ed.2d 169 (1979); Underwater Storage, Inc. v. United States Rubber Co., 314 F.Supp. 546, 549 (D.D.C.1970).
examined
Cited "see"
Home Mutual Insurance Company, Cross v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Cross
(4×)
See Hanover Insurance Co. v. Commissioner, 598 F.2d 1211 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 915 , 100 S.Ct. 229 , 62 L.Ed.2d 169 (1979); Treas.Reg. § 1.832-4(b). 16 Home Mutual admits that no legislative history of the 1962 Revenue Act supports its attempt to go outside the language of the statute.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Terrill Manor Associates v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development
See also, Preston v. United States, 596 F.2d 232, 237-38 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 915 , 100 S.Ct. 228 , 62 L.Ed.2d 169 (1979); Lambertson v. United States, 528 F.2d 441, 443 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 921 , 96 S.Ct. 2627 , 49 L.Ed.2d 374 (1976).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Preston
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 79-68.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 15, 1979.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Seventh Circuit (1)
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.