Singh v. United States, 449 U.S. 1034 (1980). · Go Syfert
Singh v. United States, 449 U.S. 1034 (1980). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“an amendment to an existing statute is not an acknowl-edgement by congress that the original statute is invalid. it is a common and customary legislative procedure to enact amendments strengthening and clarifying existing laws.”
128 citation events (13 in the last 25 years) across 16 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In Re Robert Stephen Adams, Debtor. Betty Hilda Ida Koepke Moraes v. Robert Stephen Adams, Robert Stephen Adams (ca9, 1985-05-29)
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981 2003 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) In Re Robert Stephen Adams, Debtor. Betty Hilda Ida Koepke Moraes v. Robert Stephen Adams, Robert Stephen Adams
9th Cir. · 1985 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
an amendment to an existing statute is not an acknowl-edgement by congress that the original statute is invalid. it is a common and customary legislative procedure to enact amendments strengthening and clarifying existing laws.
discussed Cited "see" Romero v. Sanchez
N.M. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Perea v. Stout, 94 N.M. 595, 600-01 , 613 P.2d 1034, 1039-40 (Ct.App.) (holding law enforcement officer’s reasonable belief that seizure and detention of plaintiff was necessary was a defense to claim of false imprisonment), cert. denied, 94 N.M. 674 , 615 P.2d 991 , and cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1035 , 101 S.Ct. 610 , 66 L.Ed.2d 496 (1980).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Oscar Roldan-Zapata and Pedro Osario-Serna (2×)
2d Cir. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Singh, 628 F.2d 758, 763 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1034 , 101 S.Ct. 609 , 66 L.Ed.2d 496 (1980).
discussed Cited "see" 48 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1050, 48 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 38,550, 27 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 506 Mary Krieger v. Gold Bond Building Products, a Division of National Gypsum Company, Defendant (2×)
2d Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Singh, 628 F.2d 758, 762 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1034 , 101 S.Ct. 609 , 66 L.Ed.2d 496 (1980); United States v. Braunig, 553 F.2d 777, 780 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 959 , 97 S.Ct. 2686 , 53 L.Ed.2d 277 (1977). 35 Even if Gold Bond had objected at trial to the admissibility of the evidence, we would find no abuse of discretion in the court's receipt of it under Rule 404(b).
discussed Cited "see" Krieger v. Gold Bond Building Products (2×)
2d Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Singh, 628 F.2d 758, 762 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1034 , 101 S.Ct. 609 , 66 L.Ed.2d 496 (1980); United States v. Braunig, 553 F.2d 777, 780 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 959 , 97 S.Ct. 2686 , 53 L.Ed.2d 277 (1977).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Anthony Bari, Tyrone Faines, Robert Benfield, Arthur Harriatt, and Craig Daniel
2d Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Singh, 628 F.2d 758 , 763 *1179 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1034 , 101 S.Ct. 609 , 66 L.Ed. 496 (1980).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. David R. Lawson (2×)
2d Cir. · 1982 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, United States v. Singh, 628 F.2d 758, 763 (2 Cir.) ("A trial court is allowed wide discretion in the management of the cross-examination of witnesses."), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1034 , 101 S.Ct. 609 , 66 L.Ed.2d 496 (1980). 57 Here, the jury knew that Harris and Bell were friends, possibly lovers.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." 25 soc.sec.rep.ser. 443, Medicare&medicaid Gu 37,849, 28 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 223 United States of America v. Bay State Ambulance and Hospital Rental Service, Inc. And Michael G. Kotzen, United States of America v. John L. Felci (2×)
1st Cir. · 1989 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, e.g., Sierra Club v. Secretary of Army, 820 F.2d 513, 522 (1st Cir.1987); see also United States v. Tapert, 625 F.2d 111, 121 (6th Cir.) ("An amendment to an existing statute is not an acknowledgement by Congress that the original statute is invalid."), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1034 , 101 S.Ct. 609 , 610, 66 L.Ed.2d 496 (1980).B.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Bay State Ambulance & Hospital Rental Service, Inc. (2×)
1st Cir. · 1989 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, e.g., Sierra Club v. Secretary of Army, 820 F.2d 513, 522 (1st Cir.1987); see also United States v. Tapert, 625 F.2d 111, 121 (6th Cir.) (“An amendment to an existing statute is not an acknowledgement by Congress that the original statute is invalid.”), ce rt. denied, 449 U.S. 1034 , 101 S.Ct. 609 , 610, 66 L.Ed.2d 496 (1980).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Isidra Callejas v. Linda McMahon and Margaret Heckler, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Third Party
3rd Cir. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Tapert, 625 F.2d 111, 121 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1034 , 101 S.Ct. 610 , 66 L.Ed.2d 496 (1980); Begay v. Kerr-McGee Corp., 499 F.Supp. 1317, 1325 (D.Ariz. 1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Singh
v.
United States
No. 80-510.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 8, 1980.
449 U.S. 1034

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.