green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Smedley v. State
(2×)
Thus, there is no showing that the trial court abused its discretion in the denial of this motion and no showing that the defendant was in any way prejudiced by the trial court's ruling." Id. at 270.
cited
Cited "see"
Bainter v. State
See State v. Dixon, 655 S.W.2d 547, 556 (Mo.App.1983) cert. denied 464 U.S. 1072 , 104 S.Ct. 982 , 79 L.Ed.2d 219 (1984); State v. Rickey, 658 S.W.2d 951, 954 (Mo.App.1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Adams v. State
See, Partlow v. State (1983), Ind., 453 N.E.2d 259 , cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1072 , 104 S.Ct. 983 , 79 L.Ed.2d 219 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Kevin Richard Johnson v. Crispus C. Nix
See United States ex rel Williams v. DeRobertis, 715 F.2d 1174, 1178-79 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 982 , 79 L.Ed.2d 219 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Wicks
See, e.g., United States v. De Robertis, 715 F.2d 1174, 1181 (7th Cir.1983) ("[Petitioner] has never contended that he would have made a different decision had he known about [the details of jury trial waiver.]”), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1072 , 104 S.Ct 982 , 79 L.Ed.2d 219 (1984); see also United States v. Williamson, 806 F.2d 216, 219 (10th Cir.1986) (defendant did not rely solely on Boykin violation and made actual allegations of involuntariness and lack of knowledge); Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(h) (absence of affirmative showing need not compel reversal of conviction if shown to be harmless error);…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Wicks
See, e.g., United States v. De Robertis, 715 F.2d 1174, 1181 (7th Cir.1983) ("[Petitioner] has never contended that he would have made a different decision had he known about [the details of jury trial waiver.]"), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1072 , 104 S.Ct. 982 , 79 L.Ed.2d 219 (1984); see also United States v. Williamson, 806 F.2d 216, 219 (10th Cir.1986) (defendant did not rely solely on Boykin violation and made actual allegations of involuntariness and lack of knowledge); Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(h) (absence of affirmative showing need not compel reversal of conviction if shown to be harmless error); …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dixon
v.
Missouri
v.
Missouri
No. 83-5787.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 16, 1984.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Ct. App. Mo., Eastern Dist. Certiorari denied.