green
Positive treatment
5.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, — v. LINDA RAY GARDNER, —
In general, “the government may comment on the failure of the defense, as opposed to - the defendant, to counter or explain the evidence [unless] the jury would naturally and necessarily take it to be a comment on the failure of the accused to testify.” United States v. Guzman, 781 F.2d 428, 432 (5th Cir.) (quotation omitted), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1143 , 106 S.Ct. 1798 , 90 L.Ed.2d 343 (1986); see United States v. Johnson, 713 F.2d 633, 651 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1081 , 104 S.Ct. 1447 , 79 L.Ed.2d 766 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Daniel M. Paradies, the Paradies Shops, Inc., Paradies Midfield Corporation, Ira Jackson
See United States v. Johnson, 713 F.2d 633, 652-53 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1081 , 104 S.Ct. 1447 , 79 L.Ed.2d 766 (1984). 37 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Paradies
See United States v. Johnson, 713 F.2d 633, 652-53 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1081 , 104 S.Ct. 1447 , 79 L.Ed.2d 766 (1984). though the evidence may be weak, insufficient, inconsistent, or of doubtful credibility." United States v. Opdahl, 930 F.2d 1530, 1535 (11th Cir.1991) (quoting United States v. Lively, 803 F.2d 1124, 1126 (11th Cir.1986)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Frank Church, Carl Louis Coppola
See United States v. Johnson, 713 F.2d 633 , 643 n. 9 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1081 , 104 S.Ct. 1447 , 79 L.Ed.2d 766 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Harris v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Johnson, 713 F.2d 633, 651 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1081 , 104 S.Ct. 1447 , 79 L.Ed.2d 766 (1984); United States v. Hager, 505 F.2d 737, 740 (8th Cir.1974); United States v. Gotchis, 803 F.2d 74, 81 (2nd Cir.1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Timothy Jones, Charles Wayne Norman, Perry Cecil Patronelli, and Richard Keith Hagler
See United States v. Holcomb, 797 F.2d 1320, 1325 (5th Cir.1986) (quoting United States v. Johnson, 713 F.2d 633, 640 (11th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 465 U.S. 1081 , 104 S.Ct. 1447 , 79 L.Ed.2d 766 (1984)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Erwin
United States v. Bolts, 558 F.2d 316, 325 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 898 , 99 S.Ct. 262 , 58 L.Ed.2d 246 (1978) (citations omitted); accord United States v. Johnson, 713 F.2d 633, 646 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1081 , 104 S.Ct. 1447 , 79 L.Ed.2d 766 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Erwin
United States v. Bolts, 558 F.2d 316, 325 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 898 , 99 S.Ct. 262 , 58 L.Ed.2d 246 (1978) (citations omitted); accord United States v. Johnson, 713 F.2d 633, 646 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1081 , 104 S.Ct. 1447 , 79 L.Ed.2d 766 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mervyn Harold Cross A/K/A Eric Cross, and Robert Carter Lodge
See also United States v. Johnson, 713 F.2d 633, 641 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1081 , 104 S.Ct. 1447 , 79 L.Ed.2d 766 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Buttrum v. Black
While it is improper for the prosecution to comment on the defendant’s failure to testify, “it is not error ‘to comment on the failure of the defense, as opposed to the defendant, to counter or explain the evidence.’ ” Id. at 1321 , quoting United States v. Bright, 630 F.2d 804, 825 (5th Cir.1980) (emphasis added by Bright court); see also United States v. Johnson, 713 F.2d 633, 650-51 (11th Cir.1983) (where defendants chose not to testify at trial but records available to the defense might have existed which would have contradicted the government’s theory of the case, prosecu-tori…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wallace v. State
See also United States v. Johnson , 713 F.2d 633 (11th Cir. 1983), cert. denied , 465 U.S. 1081 , 104 S.Ct. 1447 , 79 L.Ed.2d 766 (1984) (applying this test, the Johnson court determined that the appellant's motions were deficient and little more than bare conclusory allegations providing little clear indication of specific and exonerative facts about which the appellant's co-defendant would testify; the court further determined that the motions lacked credibility because the alleged testimony did not contravene the codefendant's penal interest).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Charles D. Griggs
See also United States v. Johnson, 713 F.2d 633 (11th Cir.1983) (where defendants chose not to testify at trial but records available to the defense might have existed which would have contradicted the government’s theory of the case, prosecutorial comment on the failure of the defense to produce any evidence or testimony in rebuttal to the espoused theory held permissible), cert. de nied, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 1447 , 79 L.Ed.2d 766 (1984); Duncan v. Stynchcombe, 704 F.2d 1213, 1215 (11th Cir.1983) (prosecutor’s comment that “there has been no evidence in this case from the *1322 defen…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Carstea
v.
Poplar Tree Homeowners Assn.
v.
Poplar Tree Homeowners Assn.
No. 83-5867.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 5, 1984.
Cited by 53 opinions | Published
Sup. Ct. Va. Certiorari denied.