Garrett v. United States, 369 U.S. 662 (1962). · Go Syfert
Search
Garrett v. United States, 369 U.S. 662 (1962). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
30 citation events across 18 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Accetturo (njd, 1985-10-18)
Treatment trajectory · 1962 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1962 1994 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Accetturo
D.N.J. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Leon, 766 F.2d 77 , page 81, (2nd Cir.1985), citing the United States v. Bentvena, 288 F.2d 442, 444, 445 (2d Cir.1961), Carbo v. United States, 288 F.2d 686, 689 (9th Cir.1961), *763 review denied, 369 U.S. 868 , 82 S.Ct. 1137 , 8 L.Ed.2d 274 (1962).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Garrett
v.
United States
773 M.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 14, 1962.
369 U.S. 662
Petitioner pro se., Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.
Clark, Coppedge, Frankfurter.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of Coppedge v. United States, ante, p. 438.

Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinion in the Coppedge case. Mr. Justice Frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.