green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.9 score
G Cite
cited 4× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1985 ·
…he legislative goal was to give conrail the opportunity to become profitable, but not necessarily to disadvantage all other railroads at the same time
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Edison Electric Institute v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Association of American Railroads, Tampa Electric Company, Carolina Power & Light Company, Western Coal Traffic League, Alabama Power Company, Eastern Coal Transportation Conference, Intervenors. Edison Electric Institute v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Tampa Electric Company, Association of American Railroads, Duke Power Company, Carolina Power & Light Company, Commonwealth Edison Co., Intervenors. Alabama Power Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Commonwealth Edison Co., Intervenors. Western Coal Traffic League v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Eastern Coal Transportation Conference v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America
(2×)
he legislative goal was to give conrail the opportunity to become profitable, but not necessarily to disadvantage all other railroads at the same time
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Edison Electric Institute v. Interstate Commerce Commission
(2×)
he legislative goal was to give conrail the opportunity to become profitable, but not necessarily to disadvantage all other railroads at the same time
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Parker v. Kowalsky & Hirschhorn, P.A.
Although we agreed that appellant did not strictly conform to the rules, we decided to “exercise our discretion and deny the motion because we do not view the violations as substantial.” Id. at 393, 458 A.2d 891 . 5 Again, while we do not condone appellant’s disregard for the Rules in the case sub judice, our conclusion is the same as in Ebert that appellant’s errors do not warrant dismissal.
cited
Cited "see"
Farah v. Stout
See Ebert v. Ritchey, 54 Md.App. 388, 398 , 458 A.2d 891 , cert. denied, 296 Md. 414 (1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1210 , 104 S.Ct. 2399 , 81 L.Ed.2d 356 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Harmon v. State
(2×)
See Clark v. State, 443 So.2d 973, 977 (Fla. 1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1210 , 104 S.Ct. 2400 , 81 L.Ed.2d 356 (1984); Riley v. State, 366 So.2d 19 (Fla. 1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wright v. State
(2×)
See Clark v. State, 443 So.2d 973 (Fla. 1983), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 104 S.Ct. 2400 , 81 L.Ed.2d 356 (1984); Johnson v. State, 442 So.2d 185 (Fla. 1983), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 104 S.Ct. 2182 , 80 L.Ed.2d 563 (1984); Vaught v. State, 410 So.2d 147 (Fla. 1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wright v. State
(2×)
See Clark v. State, 443 So.2d 973 (Fla.1983), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 2400 , 81 L.Ed.2d 356 (1984); Johnson v. State, 442 So.2d 185 (Fla.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 2182 , 80 L.Ed.2d 563 (1984); Vaught v. State, 410 So.2d 147 (Fla.1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Co-operative Legislative Committee, Railroad Brotherhoods and Railroad Unions, State of Ohio
v.
Norfolk & Western Railway Co.
v.
Norfolk & Western Railway Co.
No. 83-1712.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 21, 1984.
Sp. Ct. R. R. R. A. Cer-tiorari denied.
Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.