green
Positive treatment
4.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Pedro Carrasquillo-Plaza
But see United States v. Hemmer, 729 F.2d 10, 14-15 (1st Cir.) (defendant failed to establish Brady claim since he made only a general discovery request and reports were not obviously exculpatory in nature), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1218 , 104 S.Ct. 2666 , 81 L.Ed.2d 371 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ruiz Rijo
See United States v. Chilcote, 724 F.2d 1498, 1505 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1218 , 104 S.Ct. 2665 , 81 L.Ed.2d 370 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kathleen Joan Johnson
See United States v. Chilcote, 724 F.2d 1498, 1505 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1218 (1984). 35 AFFIRMED. * This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir.R. 36.3 1 On appeal, Defendant claims that she only consented to a three-week continuance 2 Although the issue as to whether all of the delay in Defendant's trial was attributable to the judge's illness was interjected at oral argument by ques…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Freddie Lee McDonald A/K/A Walter McDonald United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Carlos Ponton, Cross-Appellee
See United States v. Chilcote, 724 F.2d 1498, 1502 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1218 , 104 S.Ct. 2665 , 81 L.Ed.2d 370 (1984). 26 . ”[A]ny defendant on trial in a criminal case is to be tried by the jury only as to those charges of alleged crimes that are set forth in the indictment in this case.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Maribel Laboy, A/K/A Jennifer Morales, Mary Torres
See United States v. Hemmer, 729 F.2d 10, 13 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1218 , 104 S.Ct. 2666 , 81 L.Ed.2d 371 (1984); United States v. Mack, 892 F.2d 134 (1st Cir.1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bruce Milton Mack
See United States v. Hemmer, 729 F.2d 10, 13 (1st Cir.) (“In order to succeed on a claimed violation of rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, a defendant must demonstrate that he has been prejudiced.”), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1218 , 104 S.Ct. 2666 , 81 L.Ed.2d 371 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stephen W. Myatt v. United States
See United States v. Hemmer, 729 F.2d 10, 14-15 (1st Cir.) (stating that report which concluded that fingerprints retrieved from stolen money did not match those of defendant was not exculpatory), ce rt. denied, 467 U.S. 1218 , 104 S.Ct. 2666 , 81 L.Ed.2d 371 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Norman Russell Baker, Jr.
See United States v. Henderson, 721 F.2d 662, 664-65 (9th Cir.1983) (dicta suggesting that such evidence should not be admissible in federal court), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1218 , 104 S.Ct. 2665 , 81 L.Ed.2d 370 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lynne Simon, Jean Martinez, Marilyn Jacobs, and Carol Lindenberg
Fed.R.Evid. 404(b); see United States v. Chilcote, 724 F.2d 1498, 1501 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1218 , 104 S.Ct. 2665 , 81 L.Ed.2d 370 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Raymond Ellsworth v. Warden, New Hampshire State Prison, and Philip McLaughlin Attorney General for the State of New Hampshire
(2×)
See id. at 1190 ("Inadmissible evidence is by definition not material, because it never would have reached the jury and therefore could not have affected the trial outcome."); see also United States v. Hemmer, 729 F.2d 10 , 16 n.3 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1218 , 104 S.Ct. 2666 , 81 L.Ed.2d 371 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gambino
See also United States v. Hemmer, 729 F.2d 10, 17 (1st Cir.) (inconsistencies between witness’s statements before grand jury and at trial do not warrant inference that government knowingly used false testimony), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1218 , 104 S.Ct. 2666 , 81 L.Ed.2d 371 (1984); United States ex rel.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William McIntyre United States of America v. John Antonio Evans
See, e.g., United States v. Hemmer, 729 F.2d 10, 13 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1218 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Alexander Bortnovsky, A/K/A \Sasha
See also United States v. Hemmer, 729 F.2d 10, 17 (1st Cir.) (inconsistencies between witness’s statements before grand jury and at trial do not warrant inference that government knowingly used false testimony), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1218 , 104 S.Ct. 2666 , 81 L.Ed.2d 371 (1984); United States ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ladabouche
United States v. Holladay, 566 F.2d 1018, 1019 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 831 (1978); see also United States v. Hemmer, 729 F.2d 10, 17 (1st Cir.) (“Simply because there existed inconsistencies between Lovasco’s grand jury and trial testimony does not warrant the inference that the government knowingly introduced perjurious testimony.”), cert denied, 467 U.S. 1218 , 104 S. Ct. 2666 (1984); State v. Kasper, supra (inconsistent prior testimony did not establish that prosecutor knew of falsity); State v. Searles, 108 Vt. 236, 239 , 184 A. 701, 702 (1936) (State has duty to produce a…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Burks
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 83-6599.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 29, 1984.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.