green
Positive treatment
3.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
38 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1314, 38 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 35,496 Geraldine Hall v. William F. Bolger, in His Capacity as Postmaster General of the United States
But see id. at 1329-30 & n. 3 (refusing to apply 39 U.S.C.
cited
Cited "but see"
Hall v. Bolger
But see id. at 1329-30 & n. 3 (refusing to apply 39 U.S.C. § 401 (1) because underlying cause of action arose under Title VII).
discussed
Cited "see"
Greenpeace, Inc.(USA) v. State of France
See Asociacion de Reclamantes v. United Mexican States, 735 F.2d 1517, 1525 (D.C.Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 470 U.S. 1051 , 105 S.Ct. 1751 , 84 L.Ed.2d 815 (1985) (conduct complained of lacks “required nexus” with the United States because its “essential locus” was in Mexico); see also McCune v. Grand Rapids, 842 F.2d 903 (6th Cir.1988) (“claim for wrongful continued incarceration constitutes an ill effect from [claimant’s] false arrest,” not a separate tort), citing Ward v. Caulk, 650 F.2d 1144, 1147 (9th Cir.1981) (continuing ill effects from an original violation do not constit…
discussed
Cited "see"
Cathelina Antolok v. United States
(2×)
See generally Asociacion de Reclamantes v. United Mexican States, 735 F.2d 1517, 1522-23 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1051 , 105 S.Ct. 1751 , 84 L.Ed.2d 815 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Shanghai Power Co. v. Delaware Trust Co.
See Asociacion de Reclamantes v. United Mexican States, 735 F.2d 1517, 1523 (D.C.Cir.1984) (“Final settlement between the sovereigns ‘wipe[s] out the underlying private debt,’ [citation omitted] and releases the defendant sovereign from all obli *912 gations except such as the settlement agreement may provide.”), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1051 , 105 S.Ct. 1751 , 84 L.Ed.2d 815 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Josefina Najarro De Sanchez v. Banco Central De Nicaragua, a Foreign Banking Corporation
(2×)
See Asociacion de Reclamantes v. United Mexican States, 561 F.Supp. 1190, 1198 (D.D.C.1983) (where Mexico refused to compensate plaintiffs for land grant claims, discretionary exemption applied since decision not to compensate made at highest levels of government and "raise[d] substantial and serious questions of fiscal policy, and the allocation of limited resources"), aff'd on other grounds, 735 F.2d 1517 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 1751 , 84 L.Ed.2d 815 (1985); Matter of Sedco, Inc., 543 F.Supp. 561, 567 (S.D.Tex.1982) ("To deny immunity to a foreign state for the…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Youming Jin v. Ministry of State Security
See, e.g., Asociacion de Reclamantes v. United Mexican States, 735 F.2d 1517, 1525 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1051 , 105 S.Ct. 1751 , 84 L.Ed.2d 815 , (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Judah v. Shanghai Power Co.
Main Int’l Inc. v. Khuzestan Water & Power Authority, 1st Cir., 651 F.2d 800 , 814 (1981); see also Asociacion de Reclamantes v. United Mexican States, D.C.Cir., 735 F.2d 1517 (1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1051 , 105 S.Ct. 1751 , 84 L.Ed.2d 815 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Woelffer v. Happy States of America, Inc.
See, e.g., Toledo, Peona & Western Railroad v. Illinois, 744 F.2d 1296 , 1299 n. 1 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 1751 , 84 L.Ed.2d 815 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Randy Jensen v. State Board of Tax Commissioners of the State of Indiana
See, e.g., Toledo, Peoria & Western Railroad Co. v. State of Illinois, 744 F.2d 1296, 1299 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 1751 , 84 L.Ed.2d 815 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Board of School Directors of Milwaukee v. Wisconsin
See also Toledo, Peoria & Western Railroad Company v. State of Illinois, 744 F.2d 1296, 1298-99 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1051 , 105 S.Ct. 1751 , 84 L.Ed.2d 815 (1985).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lahodny
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 84-997.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 18, 1985.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.