green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.9 score
“some amount of nervousness and depression following one's arrest for murder, where the evidence of guilt is overwhelming, is normal and not grounds for holding an otherwise valid confession inadmissible.”
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Callahan v. State
some amount of nervousness and depression following one's arrest for murder, where the evidence of guilt is overwhelming, is normal and not grounds for holding an otherwise valid confession inadmissible.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dwayne A. Washington
See United States v. Rouco, 765 F.2d 983, 995 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1124 , 106 S.Ct. 1646 , 90 L.Ed.2d 190 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Salazar
See United States v. Rouco, 765 F.2d 983, 995 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1124 , 106 S.Ct. 1646 , 90 L.Ed.2d 190 (1986) (precluding *611 expert’s opinion that agent’s arrest procedure could reasonably have prompted defendant to act in self-defense); Braley v. State, 741 P.2d 1061, 1063-1064 (Wyo.1987) (rejecting psychiatric testimony regarding stress factors that could have reasonably prompted defendant’s exercise of deadly force in self-defense).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Hoskins
See United States v. Varraso, 21 MJ 129, 134 (CMA 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1124 , 106 S.Ct. 1645 , 90 L.Ed.2d 190 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Moses Otis Williams, A/K/A Chubby
See United States v. Rouco, 765 F.2d 983 (11th Cir.1985), reh’g denied, en banc, 772 F.2d 918 (11th Cir.Fla.1985), cer t. denied, 475 U.S. 1124 , 106 S.Ct. 1646 , 90 L.Ed.2d 190 (1986) (conviction for carrying a firearm during a felony sustained where firearm not produced at trial but experienced law enforcement officer familiar with weapons testified that alleged firearm was a firearm and circumstantial evidence of use of a firearm was also presented).
cited
Cited "see"
Whitaker v. United States
See id., citing Collins v. United States, 491 A.2d 480, 484 (D.C.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1124 , 106 S.Ct. 1646 , 90 L.Ed.2d 190 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mervyn Harold Cross A/K/A Eric Cross, and Robert Carter Lodge
See United States v. Rouco, 765 F.2d 983, 995 (11th Cir.1985) (expert may be used if his testimony can offer something “beyond the understanding and experience of the average citizen”), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1124 , 106 S.Ct. 1646 , 90 L.Ed.2d 190 (1986); Burchfield, 719 F.2d at 357 (expert testimony admissible where it is “the kind that enlightens and informs lay persons without expertise in a specialized field”).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John E. Chapman
See United States v. Rouco, 765 F.2d 983, 994 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1124 , 106 S.Ct. 1646 , 90 L.Ed.2d 190 (1986) (finding that hearsay statements had circumstantial guarantees of trustworthiness and were thus admissible under Rule 804(b)(5) largely because they were substantially corroborated by other evidence).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cook v. State
(2×)
Accord United States v. Rouco, 765 F.2d 983 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1124 , 106 S.Ct. 1646 , 90 L.Ed.2d 190 (1986); United States v. Carlin, 698 F.2d 1133 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 958 , 103 S.Ct. 2431 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1317 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Byrd
See, e.g., United States v. Rouco, 765 F. 2d 983, 993-95 (11th Cir. 1985) (admitting hearsay statement of witness killed by defendant pursuant to federal residual hearsay exceptions), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1124 , 106 S.Ct 1646 , 90 L.Ed. 2d 190 (1986); United States v. Carlson, 547 F. 2d 1346, 1353-55 (8th Cir.1976) (admitting, pursuant to federal residual hearsay exception, hearsay statement of witness who refused to testify due to defendant's threats), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 914 , 97 S.Ct 2174 , 53 L.Ed. 2d 224 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Byrd
See, e.g., United States v. Rouco, 765 F.2d 983, 993-95 (11th Cir.1985) (admitting hearsay statement of witness killed by defendant pursuant to federal residual hearsay exceptions), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1124 , 106 S.Ct. 1646 , 90 L.Ed.2d 190 (1986); United States v. Carlson, 547 F.2d 1346, 1353-55 (8th Cir.1976) (admitting, pursuant to federal residual hearsay exception, hearsay statement of witness who refused to testify due to defendant’s threats), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 914 , 97 S.Ct. 2174 , 53 L.Ed.2d 224 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Paul
Properly qualified expert witnesses may testify regarding their specialized knowledge in a given field if it “would assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue.” Fed.R.Evid. 702; see also United States v. Rouco, 765 F.2d 983, 995 (11th Cir.1985) (arguing that counsel may use an expert if the expert’s testimony can offer something “beyond the understanding and experience of the average citizen”), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1124 , 106 S.Ct. 1646 , 90 L.Ed.2d 190 (1986); United States v. Burchfield, 719 F.2d 356 (11th Cir.1983) (explaining that expert…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Carl Leslie Buggs
See also United States v. Rouco, 765 F.2d 983, 996 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 11.5. 1124, 106 S.Ct. 1646 , 90 L.Ed.2d 190 (1986), where the defendant challenged a § 924(c) conviction on the ground that "the government failed to prove that the pistol was in fact a firearm capable of expelling a projectile." The Eleventh Circuit concluded that this argument was "imaginative, but frivolous." Id. 10 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Magouirk
See also, U.S. v. Rouco, 765 F.2d 983 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1124 , 106 S.Ct. 1646 , 90 L.Ed.2d 190 (1986); U.S. v. Potamitis, 739 F.2d 784 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 934 , 105 S.Ct. 332 , 83 L.Ed.2d 269 (1984); U.S. v. Carlson, 547 F.2d 1346 (8th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 914 , 97 S.Ct. 2174 , 53 L.Ed.2d 224 (1977).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kakar
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 85-1566.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 21, 1986.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Criminal Appeals of A… (1)
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.