green
Positive treatment
2.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1901 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1901
1963
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Lawrenson v. Worcester Lunch Car & Carriage Manufacturing Co.
See Hamilton v. Cults, 4 Mass. 349 , 353; Pitkin v. Leavitt, 13 Vt. 379, 384 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Sisk v. Woodruff
See, also, Hamilton v. Cutts, 4 Mass. 349 ; Cooper v. Watson, 10 Wend. 202 ; and Miner v. Clark, 15 Ib. 425.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dupuy v. Roebuck
Such an act, by a lawful and paramount claim, would disturb the enjoyment of the possession; and the plaintiff, being compelled to purchase in, another title, for his own security, would be authorized to reimburse himself, by suing for a breach of covenant. [2 Lomax on Real Property, 273, 274; see, also, Hamilton v. Cutts, 4 Mass. Rep. 349 ; Sprague v. Baker, 17 Mass. Rep. 586 ; Mackey v. Collins, 2 Nott & McC.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Weckerly v. Ministers of the German Lutheran Congregation
See also Stone v. Hocker, 9 Cowan, 154, and Hamilton v. Cutts, 4 Mass. Rep. 349 , from which the same principle is deducible.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Governor ex rel. Newman v. Shelby
See, also, Bender v. Fromberger, 4 Dall. 436.—Hamilton v. Cutts, 4 Mass. 349 . 'But the present, case is entirely dissimilar.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Levi Rogers, versus Benjamin Hill
Published
The Court
refused to receive the affidavit, saying he should have summoned the witness referred to, or have obtained his deposition. The affidavitof a party petitioning for a review, is not tobe received except when testifying'to facts which can be known but to himself alone, or to obtain an order of notice on his petition.