Williams v. Greene, 246 S.E.2d 12 (N.C. 1978). · Go Syfert
Search
Williams v. Greene, 246 S.E.2d 12 (N.C. 1978). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“defendants are law enforcement officers and as such are 'public officers”
40 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Baker v. Smith (ncctapp, 2012-12-18)
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978 2002 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Baker v. Smith (3×) also: Cited "see"
N.C. Ct. App. · 2012 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
defendants are law enforcement officers and as such are 'public officers
discussed Cited "see" Crump v. BD. OF ED. OF HICKORY AD. SU (2×)
N.C. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Williams v. Greene, 36 N.C.App. 80 , 243 S.E.2d 156 , disc. rev. denied and appeal dismissed, 295 N.C. 471 , 246 S.E.2d 12 (1978).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Snuggs v. STANLY CTY. DEPT. OF PUBLIC HEALTH (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 1983 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Jones v. City of Greensboro, 51 N.C.App. 571 , 277 S.E.2d 562 (1981), and Williams v. Greene, 36 N.C.App. 80 , 243 S.E.2d 156 , rev. denied, 295 N.C. 471 , 246 S.E.2d 12 (1978), cases where our appellate courts have recognized that our courts have such concurrent jurisdiction over Section 1983 claims.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Robert O. WILLIAMS
v.
G. Perry GREENE, Edward W. Jones and J. D. Cabe.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Jul 14, 1978.
246 S.E.2d 12
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 64%
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of North Caro… (1)

Blackwell M. Brogden, Blackwell M. Brogden, Jr., for plaintiff.

Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen., William W. Melvin, Deputy Atty. Gen., for the defendants.

Plaintiff's notice of appeal and petition for discretionary review under GS 7A-31, 36 N.C.App. 80, 243 S.E.2d 156. Petition denied. Motion of the Defendants to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question. Allowed.