green
Positive treatment
1.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Raritan River Steel Co. v. Cherry, Bekaert & Holland
(2×)
See Burrow v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 88 N.C.App. 347, 351 , 363 S.E.2d 215, 218 , disc. rev. denied, 322 N.C. 111 , 367 S.E.2d 910 (1988) and Smith v. Currie, 40 N.C.App. 739, 742 , 253 S.E.2d 645, 647 , disc. rev. denied, 297 N.C. 612 , 257 S.E.2d 219 (1979) (citation omitted) (issues of intent are "rarely susceptible to direct proof and almost always depends on inferences drawn from circumstantial evidence," therefore summary judgment is generally not appropriate when such an issue is involved, or where the evidence "`is subject to conflicting interpretations,' " or where reasonable pe…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Frankie REID
v.
ECKERDS DRUGS, INC.
v.
ECKERDS DRUGS, INC.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Jul 12, 1979.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Newsom, Graham, Hedrick, Murray, Bryson & Kennon, for defendant.
Grover C. McCain, Jr., for plaintiff.
Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. § 7A-31. 40 N.C.App. 476, 253 S.E.2d 344. Denied.