State v. Blankenship, 312 S.E.2d 648 (N.C. 1984). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Blankenship, 312 S.E.2d 648 (N.C. 1984). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
17 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Jennings v. Jessen (ncctapp, 1991-08-20)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Jennings v. Jessen
N.C. Ct. App. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Shaver v. Monroe Construction Co., 63 N.C.App. 605, 617 , 306 S.E.2d 519, 527 (1983), disc. rev. denied, 310 N.C. 154 , 311 S.E.2d 294 (1984) (where plaintiff established entitlement to punitive damages, but court erred in instruction on compensatory damages, new trial was required on issue of punitive damages because "there is a substantial likelihood that the two issues [compensatory and punitive damages] were so intertwined in the minds of the jurors that it would result in an injustice to remand this case for a new trial on one issue only") (quoting Carawan v. Tate, 53 N.C.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE
v.
BLANKENSHIP
No. 560P83.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Jan 10, 1984.
312 S.E.2d 648
Published

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 10 January 1984 for the sole purpose of remanding the case in order that defendant may be resentenced under the Fair Sentencing Act.