Hartsell v. Hartsell, 397 S.E.2d 218 (N.C. 1990). · Go Syfert
Search
Hartsell v. Hartsell, 397 S.E.2d 218 (N.C. 1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
29 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Shumaker v. Shumaker (ncctapp, 2000-03-21)
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
examined Cited "see" Shumaker v. Shumaker (4×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hartsell v. Hartsell, 99 N.C.App. 380, 387 , 393 S.E.2d 570, 575 ("In civil contempt the [alleged contemnor] has the burden of presenting evidence to show that he was not in contempt and [he] refuses to present such evidence at his own peril."), appeal dismissed and disc. review denied, 327 N.C. 482 , 397 S.E.2d 218 (1990), aff'd per curiam, 328 N.C. 729 , 403 S.E.2d 307 (1991).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Billie M. HARTSELL
v.
Gene W. HARTSELL.
405A90.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Oct 3, 1990.
397 S.E.2d 218
Published

Douglas E. Brafford, Matthews, for defendant.

William K. Diehl, Jr. and Barbara J. Hellenschmidt, Charlotte, for plaintiff.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Plaintiff; and upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Defendant pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal (except issues presented in dissent) is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of October 1990."

The Petition for Discretionary Review as to additional issues is:

[*219] "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of October 1990."

Accordingly, the new brief of Defendant shall be filed with this Court not more than 30 days from the date of certification of this order.

Defendant shall forthwith submit an appeal bond to this Court, as provided by Appellate Rule 17(b). The bond may be in cash or by a written undertaking with good and sufficient surety in the sum of $250.00.