State v. Richardson, 426 S.E.2d 712 (N.C. 1993). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Richardson, 426 S.E.2d 712 (N.C. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“whether the witness qualifies as an expert is exclusively within the trial judge's discretion 'and is not to be reversed on appeal absent a complete lack of evidence to support his ruling.”
34 citation events (18 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Anderson (ncctapp, 2008-12-16)
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) State v. Anderson
N.C. Ct. App. · 2008 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
whether the witness qualifies as an expert is exclusively within the trial judge's discretion 'and is not to be reversed on appeal absent a complete lack of evidence to support his ruling.
cited Cited "see" Williams v. Williams
N.C. Ct. App. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Schultz v. Schultz, 107 N.C.App. 366, 374 , 420 S.E.2d 186, 191 (1992), disc. review denied, 333 N.C. 347 , 426 S.E.2d 710 (1993).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Mixion
N.C. Ct. App. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Davis, 106 N.C.App. 596, 604 , 418 S.E.2d 263, 268 (1992), disc. rev. denied, 333 N.C. 347 , 426 S.E.2d 710 (1993) (although error to allow unlimited expert testimony on post-traumatic stress disorder, error was not prejudicial in light of other strong and convincing evidence).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE
v.
RICHARDSON
No. 424P92.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Feb 11, 1993.
426 S.E.2d 712
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 73%
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of North Caro… (1)

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 11 February 1993.