Pittman v. Int'l Paper Co., 534 S.E.2d 596 (N.C. 1999). · Go Syfert
Search
Pittman v. Int'l Paper Co., 534 S.E.2d 596 (N.C. 1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
25 citation events (20 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Jenkins v. Easco Aluminum Corp. (ncctapp, 2001-02-06)
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Jenkins v. Easco Aluminum Corp. (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 2001 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Pittman v. International Paper Co., 132 N.C.App. 151 , 510 S.E.2d 705 , disc. review denied, 350 N.C. 310 , 534 S.E.2d 596 , affirmed, 351 N.C. 42 , 519 S.E.2d 524 (1999), where the plaintiff made a similar argument with regard to a Dr. Markworth's deposition testimony, but there were "various findings throughout the Opinion and Award of the Commission indicat[ing] consideration of Dr. Markworth's opinion." Id. at 159, 510 S.E.2d at 710 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PITTMAN
v.
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO.
No. 86A99.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Apr 8, 1999.
534 S.E.2d 596
Published

Petition by defendants for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals denied 8 April 1999.