Rifenburg Const. v. Brier Creek Assocs., 593 S.E.2d 585 (N.C. 2004). · Go Syfert
Search
Rifenburg Const. v. Brier Creek Assocs., 593 S.E.2d 585 (N.C. 2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“our supreme court has further held that a joint venture does not exist where each party to an agreement cannot direct the conduct of the other.”
16 citation events (16 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Ds & T II, Inc. v. D & E Tax & Acct., Inc. (ncbizct, 2021-10-04)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Ds & T II, Inc. v. D & E Tax & Acct., Inc.
N.C. Bus. Ct. · 2021 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
our supreme court has further held that a joint venture does not exist where each party to an agreement cannot direct the conduct of the other.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Carl v. State
N.C. Ct. App. · 2008 · confidence medium
This Court explained that “[w]hen a state agency . . . enters into an agreement with a developer, who then alone enters into a contract with a contractor, the state agency waives its sovereign immunity only to the original party to their agreement not to others.” Id. at 631, 586 S.E.2d at 816 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
RIFENBURG CONSTRUCTION, INC.
v.
BRIER CREEK ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, North Carolina Department of Transportation, RTP Assemblage Associates, LLC, Athena Airport Assemblage, LP, and Athena Airport Assemblage Corp.
583A03.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Apr 2, 2004.
593 S.E.2d 585
Per Curiam.
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 77%
Citer courts: North Carolina Business Court (1)

Safran Law Offices, by Perry R. Safran, John M. Sperati, and Brian J. Schoolman, Raleigh, for plaintiff-appellant.

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Joseph E. Herrin, Assistant Attorney General, for defendant-appellee North Carolina Department of Transportation.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.