green
Positive treatment
4.8 score
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Minnesota Automatic Merchandising Council v. Smith
Westling v. County of Mille Lacs, 581 N.W.2d 815 , 820 (Minn.1998) (stating that neither clause is more restrictive); Little Earth of United Tribes, Inc. v. Hennepin County, 384 N.W.2d 435, 441 (Minn. 1986) (finding that both clauses are “equally restrictive of the legislature’s power to tax and to classify”).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
In Re Property of One Church Street
Commonwealth v. Life Assurance Co. of Pennsylvania, 419 Pa. 370, 389 , 214 A.2d 209, 220 (1965) (distinctive treatment accorded domestic life and nonlife insurers by tax of gross premiums did not violate uniformity clauses of federal or state constitutions), appeal dismissed, 384 U.S. 268 (1966); Little Earth of United Tribes, Inc. v. County of Hennepin, 384 N.W.2d 435, 441 (Minn. 1986) (distinction between private, government subsidized housing and wholly public property was reasonably related to legitimate state purpose); Roosevelt Properties Co. v. Kinney, 12 Ohio St. 3d 7, 13-14 , 465 N.E.…
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. City of Owatonna
(2×)
See Little Earth of United Tribes, Inc. v. County of Hennepin, 384 N.W.2d 435, 441 (Minn.1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Noon Realty, Inc. v. Aetna Insurance Co.
See also L & H Transport, Inc. v. Drew Agency, Inc., 369 N.W.2d 608 (Minn.Ct.App.1985), affirmed 384 N.W.2d 435 (Minn.1986).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
L & H TRANSPORT, INC., Appellant,
v.
the DREW AGENCY, INC., Defendant and Third Party Plaintiff, Respondent, v. CHUBB AND SONS, INC., Third Party Defendant, Respondent; And L & H TRANSPORT, INC., Appellant, v. CHUBB & SONS, INC., Respondent
v.
the DREW AGENCY, INC., Defendant and Third Party Plaintiff, Respondent, v. CHUBB AND SONS, INC., Third Party Defendant, Respondent; And L & H TRANSPORT, INC., Appellant, v. CHUBB & SONS, INC., Respondent
C6-85-104.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
Jul 8, 1986.
384 N.W.2d 435
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Court of Appeals be, and the same is, hereby affirmed. See Henning Nelson Const. Co. v. Fireman’s Fund American Life Ins. Co., 383 N.W.2d 645 (Minn., filed March 21, 1986).