People v. Posby, 583 N.W.2d 458 (Mich. 1998). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. Posby, 583 N.W.2d 458 (Mich. 1998). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
26 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: People of Michigan v. Kenneth Wayne Peters (mich, 2016-03-11)
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" People of Michigan v. Kenneth Wayne Peters
Mich. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See People v Posby, 459 Mich 21, 22 (1998); People v Peters, 449 Mich 515, 521-522 (1995); People v Weston, 348 NW2d 262 (1984).
cited Cited "see" People of Michigan v. Kenneth Wayne Peters
Mich. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See People v Posby, 459 Mich 21, 22 (1998); People v Peters, 449 Mich 515, 521-522 (1995); People v Weston, 348 NW2d 262 (1984).
cited Cited "see" In Re Sprint Communications Co.
Mich. Ct. App. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See, generally, in In re MCI Telecommunications Complaint ( Ameritech Michigan v. Public Service Comm.), 229 Mich.App. 664 , 583 N.W.2d 458 (1998), lv gtd. 459 Mich. 878 , 586 N.W.2d 744 (1998).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross-Appellee,
v.
Chester Leo POSBY, Defendant-Appellee, Cross-Appellant.
111619.
Michigan Supreme Court.
Sep 15, 1998.
583 N.W.2d 458
Mallett.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Thomas L. Casey, Solicitor General, Brian L. Mackie, Prosecuting Attorney, and Lenore M. Ferber, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney Ann Arbor, for people.

State Appellate Defender by Richard B. Ginsberg, Detroit, for defendant-appellee.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In 1994, the defendant was found guilty, but mentally ill, of first-degree murder. Defendant appealed, and the Court of Appeals reversed defendant's conviction and remanded the case for further proceedings. 227 Mich.App. 219, 574 N.W.2d 398 (1997).

The prosecutor has applied to this Court for leave to appeal, and defendant applied for leave to appeal as cross-appellant. However, we are informed that the defendant has died.

Given the first-out rule, MCR 7.215(H), and the fact that the defendant's death prevents us from reviewing the Court of Appeals two to one opinion, we vacate the opinion and dismiss the application for leave to appeal and the application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant. MCR 7.302(F)(1).

MALLETT, C.J., and BRICKLEY, MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH, BOYLE, WEAVER, MICHAEL J. KELLY, and TAYLOR, JJ., concurred.