green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
3.7 score
“a petition for reconsideration is not a proper method for making an argument for the first time.”
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010
2018
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Us Bank, NA v. Eckert
a petition for reconsideration is not a proper method for making an argument for the first time.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Antoine v. Taylor
See also State v. Molver, 233 Or App 239 , 225 P3d 136 , rev den, 348 Or 291 (2010); State v. Magana, 212 Or App 553, 565 , 159 P3d 1163 , rev den, 343 Or 363 (2007).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Mansor
The Court concluded that, in contrast to historical observations that a search of a person’s pockets was far less intrusive than a search of a residence, “a cell phone search would typically expose to the government far more than the most exhaustive search of a house: A phone not only contains in digital form many sensitive records previously found in the home; it also contains a broad array of private information never found in a home in any form— unless the phone is.” Id. at _, 134 S Ct at 2491 ; see also State v. Bellar, 231 Or App 80, 103-04 , 217 P3d 1094 (2009), rev den, 348 Or 2…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
KESSLER
v.
BELLEQUE.
v.
BELLEQUE.
S058256.
Oregon Supreme Court.
May 13, 2010.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Oregon (1)
Petition for Review Denied.