discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Coombs And LeBeau itself implicitly acknowledges this limitation of the requirement to conduct a proportionality analysis, stating, "[C]ourts should consider all relevant facts raised by the parties about the defendant's crime in relation to the harshness of the penalty." LeBeau v. State , 2014 UT 39 , ¶ 42, 337 P.3d 254 (emphasis added); see also State v. Norton , 2018 UT App 82 , ¶ 79, 427 P.3d 312 ("[W]e will not fault the court for failing to conduct a sua sponte review of the Utah Code to identify similar offenses and then compare their sentencing schemes to the sentence it intended to impose …