Commonwealth v. Lloyd, 800 A.2d 927 (Pa. 2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Commonwealth v. Lloyd, 800 A.2d 927 (Pa. 2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: McNaughton v. McNaughton (pactcompldauphi, 2005-07-07)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" McNaughton v. McNaughton
pactcompldauphi · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hamilton v. Hennessey, 783 A.2d 852 (Pa. Commw. 2001) (en banc), aff’d, 569 Pa. 101 , 800 A.2d 927 (2003) (per curiam); Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Williams, 62 F.3d 408, 418, 421 (D.C.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Commonwealth v. Orie
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2014 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Hamilton v. Hennessey, 783 A.2d 852 (Pa.Cmwlth.2001) (Speech or Debate Clause does not preclude discovery regarding whether newsletters were “campaign expenses” under Election Code), aff'd, 569 Pa. 101 , 800 A.2d 927 (2002).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania
v.
Marcus LLOYD
No. 312 CAP.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
May 29, 2002.
800 A.2d 927
Published

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of May, 2002, the Petition to Remand for Resentencing is granted and the matter is remanded to the common pleas court for a new sentencing hearing.