green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
23.6 score
“here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.”
Treatment trajectory · 2016 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2016
2021
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
In the Interest of: D.I.T.M. Appeal of: S.R.T.
here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re: K.K., a Minor
See In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330 , 339 n.3 (Pa.Super. 2011), appeal denied, 611 Pa. 643 , 24 A.3d 364 (2011) (quoting In re A.C., 991 A.2d 884, 897 (Pa.Super. 2010)) (“[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.”); see also In re M.Z.T.M.W., 163 A.3d 462, 465-66 (Pa.Super. 2017). - 14 - J-A28041-21 Regardless, even if not waived, such a challenge is without merit.
discussed
Cited "see"
In the Int. of C.L. Appeal of: B.L.
See In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330 , 339 n.3 (Pa.Super. 2011), appeal denied, 611 Pa. 643 , 24 A.3d 364 (2011) (quoting In re A.C., 991 A.2d 884, 897 (Pa.Super. 2010)) (“[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.”); see also In re M.Z.T.M.W., 163 A.3d 462, 466 (Pa.Super. 2017).
discussed
Cited "see"
In the Int. of: J.W., Appeal of: W.L.
See In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330 , 339 n.3 (Pa.Super. 2011), appeal denied, 611 Pa. 643 , 24 A.3d 364 (2011) (quoting In re A.C., 991 A.2d 884, 897 (Pa.Super. 2010)) (“[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.”); see also In re M.Z.T.M.W., 163 A.3d 462, 465-66 (Pa.Super. 2017).13 ____________________________________________ 13 We note that, even if Father’s claim were preserved, it would be without merit.
discussed
Cited "see"
In the Int. of: L v. Appeal of: J.H.
See In re W.H. , 25 A.3d 330 , 339 n.3 (Pa.Super. 2011), appeal denied , 611 Pa. 643 , 24 A.3d 364 (2011) (quoting In re A.C. , 991 A.2d 884 , 897 (Pa.Super. 2010) ) ("[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived"); see also In re M.Z.T.M.W. , 163 A.3d 462 , 465-66 (Pa.Super. 2017).
discussed
Cited "see"
In the Int. of: L v. Appeal of: J.H.
See In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330 , 339 n.3 (Pa.Super. 2011), appeal denied, 611 Pa. 643 , 24 A.3d 364 (2011) (quoting In re A.C., 991 A.2d 884, 897 (Pa.Super. 2010)) (“[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived”); see also In re M.Z.T.M.W., 163 A.3d 462 , 465-66 - 19 - J-A07035-19 (Pa.Super. 2017).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re: J.C.W., Jr., a minor, Appeal of: J.C.W.
See In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330 , 339 n.3 (Pa.Super. 2011), appeal denied, 611 Pa. 643 , 24 A.3d 364 (2011) (quoting In re A.C., 991 A.2d 884, 897 (Pa.Super. 2010)) (“[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.”); see also In re M.Z.T.M.W., 163 A.3d 462, 465-66 (Pa.Super. 2017).
discussed
Cited "see"
Adoption of B.X.D., Appeal of D.T.M.
See In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330 , 339 - 15 - J-S63045-18 n.3 (Pa.Super. 2011), appeal denied, 611 Pa. 643 , 24 A.3d 364 (2011) (quoting In re A.C., 991 A.2d 884, 897 (Pa.Super. 2010)) (“[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.”); see also In re M.Z.T.M.W., 163 A.3d 462, 465-66 (Pa.Super. 2017).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re: Adoption of K.L v. Appeal of: C.R.
See In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330 , 339 n.3 (Pa.Super. 2011), appeal denied, 611 Pa. 643 , 24 A.3d 364 (2011) (quoting In re A.C., 991 A.2d 884, 897 (Pa.Super. 2010)) (“[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.”); see also In re M.Z.T.M.W., 163 A.3d 462, 465-66 (Pa.Super. 2017).
discussed
Cited "see"
Adoption of S.R.P., Appeal of: J.P., father
See In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330 , 339 n.3 (Pa.Super. 2011), appeal denied, 611 Pa. 643 , 24 A.3d 364 (2011) (quoting In re A.C., 991 A.2d 884, 897 (Pa.Super. 2010)) (“[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.”). -7- J-S60045-17 In re T.S.M., 620 Pa. 602, 628 , 71 A.3d 251, 267 (2013).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. McClure
See In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330, 334 (Pa. Super,), appeal denied, 611 Pa. 643 , 24 A.3d 364 (2011).
discussed
Cited "see"
B.A.B. v. J.J.B.
See In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330, 334 (Pa. Super. 2011) (appellate court may question the appealability of an order sua sponte as it implicates the court’s jurisdiction), appeal denied, 611 Pa. 643 , 24 A.3d 364 (2011).
discussed
Cited "see"
B.A.B. v. J.J.B.
See In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330, 334 (Pa. Super. 2011) (appellate court may question the appealability of an order sua sponte as it implicates the court’s jurisdiction), appeal denied, 611 Pa. 643 , 24 A.3d 364 (2011).
discussed
Cited "see"
B.A.B. v. J.J.B.
See In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330, 334 (Pa. Super. 2011) (appellate court may question the appealability of an order sua sponte as it implicates the court’s jurisdiction), appeal denied, 611 Pa. 643 , 24 A.3d 364 (2011).
discussed
Cited "see"
B.A.B. v. J.J.B.
See In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330, 334 (Pa. Super. 2011) (appellate court may question the appealability of an order sua sponte as it implicates the court’s jurisdiction), appeal denied, 611 Pa. 643 , 24 A.3d 364 (2011).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In the Int. of: N.J., a Minor, Appeal of: B.P.
In fact, she states, “The record confirms that this court and DHS did not notify me of the July 1, 2019 -7- J-A05039-21 Moreover, Maternal Aunt waived any challenge relating to the denial of nunc pro tunc relief as she failed to raise and address this issue in her Rule 1925(b) statement, in the Statement of Questions Involved section of her appellate brief, or the Argument portion thereof.8 See Krebs v. United Refining Co., 893 A.2d 776, 797 (Pa.Super. 2006) (stating that a failure to preserve issues by raising them both in the concise statement of errors complained of on appeal and statemen…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In the Int. of: A.A., Appeal of: A.B.
See Krebs v. United Refining Co., 893 A.2d 776, 797 (Pa. Super. 2006) (stating that a failure to preserve issues by raising them both in the concise statement of errors complained of on appeal and statement of questions involved portion of the brief on appeal results in a waiver of those issues). 13 See Pa.R.A.P. 2101 (stating, “Briefs and reproduced records shall conform in all material respects with the requirements of these rules as nearly as the circumstances of the particular case will admit, otherwise they may be suppressed. . . .); see also In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330 , 339 n.3 (Pa.Super.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In the Interest of: L.R.J.P., a Minor
Mother argues that the trial court erred in not granting her motion for separate legal-interests counsel due to evidence ____________________________________________ 797 (Pa.Super. 2006) (stating that a failure to preserve issues by raising them both in the concise statement of errors complained of on appeal and statement of questions involved portion of the brief on appeal results in a waiver of those issues); see also In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330 , 339 n.3 (Pa.Super. 2011), appeal denied, 611 Pa. 643 , 24 A.3d 364 (2011) (quoting In re A.C., 991 A.2d 884, 897 (Pa.Super. 2010)) (“[W]here an appe…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In the Interest of: J.K.A.B., a Minor
“If the factual findings are supported, ____________________________________________ 6 See Krebs v. United Refining Co., 893 A.2d 776, 797 (Pa.Super. 2006) (stating that a failure to preserve issues by raising them in the concise statement of errors complained of on appeal results in a waiver of those issues)(citing Pa.R.A.P. 2116); see also In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330 , 339 n.3 (Pa.Super. 2011), appeal denied, 611 Pa. 643 , 24 A.3d 364 (2011) (quoting In re A.C., 991 A.2d 884, 897 (Pa.Super. 2010)) (“[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to releva…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In the Interest of: J.F.W., a Minor
See Krebs v. United Refining Co., 893 A.2d 776, 797 (Pa.Super. 2006) (stating that a failure to preserve issues by raising them both in the concise statement of errors complained of on appeal and statement of questions involved portion of the brief on appeal results in a waiver of those issues); see also In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330 , 339 n.3 (Pa.Super. 2011), appeal denied, 611 Pa. 643 , 24 A.3d 364 (2011) (quoting In re A.C., 991 A.2d 884, 897 (Pa.Super. 2010)) (“[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the iss…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
A.J.B. v. A.G.B. Appeal of: A.M.G.
See Krebs , 893 A.2d at 797 ; see also In re W.H. , 25 A.3d 330 , 339 n.3 (Pa.Super. 2011), appeal denied, 611 Pa. 643 , 24 A.3d 364 (2011) (quoting In re A.C. , 991 A.2d 884 , 897 (Pa.Super. 2010) ) ("[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.").
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
WEINBERGER
v.
WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
v.
WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
678 EAL (2010).
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Jul 7, 2011.
Published
Citer courts: Superior Court of Pennsylvania (1)
Disposition of Petition for Allowance of Appeal Denied.