green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
10.1 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1988 ·
…where the injury and cause thereof are subtler and more complicated than in the normal malpractice case, it seems particularly inappropriate to determine as a matter of law what the plaintiff should have known
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 47 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
McHugh Inc. v. Soldo Const. Co., Inc.
monetary awards will be upheld as long as such awards bear a logical relationship to the evidence or as long as there is a rational basis therefor.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
John Barren, an Incompetent, by His Guardian, Henrietta Barren v. United States
(2×)
where the injury and cause thereof are subtler and more complicated than in the normal malpractice case, it seems particularly inappropriate to determine as a matter of law what the plaintiff should have known
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Bucey
charge of conspiracy is sufficient if it follows the statutory language and contains an adequate statement of an overt act to effectuate the object of the conspiracy, and the requisite overt act need not be criminal in itself.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ambrose
See United States v. Brighton Building & Maintenance Co., 598 F.2d 1101, 1105 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 840[, 100 S.Ct. 79 , 80, 62 L.Ed.2d 52 ] (1979) (criminal antitrust prosecution: “Defendants [are] not entitled to an instruction which [includes] the ... phrase [that the defendant knowingly did an act which the law forbids, purposely intending to violate the law]. ‘A requirement of proof not only of this knowledge of likely effects, but also of a conscious desire to bring them to fruition or to violate the law would seem, particularly in such a context, both unnecessaril…
cited
Cited "see"
Haggart v. Cho
See Greenberg v. McCabe, 453 F.Supp. 765, 772 (1978), affirmed, 594 F.2d 854 (3d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 79 , 62 L.Ed.2d 51 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 369 v. Office & Professional Employees Union, Local 367
Grace & Co. v. Rubber Workers, 461 U.S. 757, 764 (1983); see Morgan Servs., Inc. v. Amalgamated Clothing and Textile Workers Union, Local 323, 724 F.2d 1217, 1221 (6th Cir.1984) ("It is well established that the power to construe ambiguous contract provisions lies with the arbitrator...."). 10 In construing a labor agreement, the arbitrator may also look for guidance to "the 'practices of the shop' that have developed between the parties in the day-to-day administration of the collective bargaining agreement." Detroit Coil Co. v. International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, Lodge # 8…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Pearley Candor Hemingway, A/K/A P.C.
See United States v. Watson, 594 F.2d 1330 (10th Cir.) cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 (1979) (tape may be excluded if unintelligible portions are so significant that whole recording is rendered untrustworthy). 7 We find no abuse of discretion in the admission of evidence of Hemingway's prior drug conviction and his aborted attempt to sell cocaine to an undercover officer.
discussed
Cited "see"
Diazo Service Co. v. Redmond (In Re Diazo Service Co.)
See Del Rio Distrib., Inc. v. Adolph Coors Co., 589 F.2d 176 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 80 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 (1979) (affirmed trial court’s denial of a new trial based on a change in the applicable legal standard during the trial due to a Supreme Court decision.
discussed
Cited "see"
Blanton v. Housing Authority
(2×)
See Rodriguez de Quinonez v. Perez, 596 F.2d 486 [1st Cir.1978], cert. den., 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 78 , 62 L.Ed.2d 51 [1979]; Burkhart v. Randles, 764 F.2d 1196, 1201 [6th Cir.1985]; McGhee v. Draper, supra . (4) The Iowa Supreme Court, relying on Fifth Circuit jurisprudence in Rosenstein, supra note 3 , holds that a discharged nontenured public employee must request a name-clearing hearing to establish a § 1983 liberty interest claim.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Anna Irene Martinez
See Model Penal Code Sec. 5.03 comment (Official Draft and Revised Comments 1985). 6 As this court has indicated in United States v. Watson, 594 F.2d 1330, 1340 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 78 , 62 L.Ed.2d 51 (1979), 7 Where large quantities of narcotics are being distributed, each major buyer may be presumed to know that he is part of a wide-ranging venture, the success of which depends on performance by others whose identity he may not even know. 8 See also Blumenthal v. United States, 332 U.S. 539, 559 , 68 S.Ct. 248, 257 , 92 L.Ed. 154 (1947).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Portac, Inc., United States of America v. Howard L. Wolf
See *1297 United States v. Roberts, 618 F.2d 530, 535 (9th Cir.1980), United States v. Brighton Bldg. & Maintenance Co., 598 F.2d 1101 , 1109 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 80 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gabriel Alvarez, Gustavo Holguin, Leovigilda Rivera, Humberto Olivares Castrellon and Oneyda Zambrana
(2×)
United States v. Phillips, 664 F.2d 971, 1032 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981) (emphasis supplied), ce rt. denied, 457 U.S. 1136 , 102 S.Ct. 2965 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1354 (1982); see United States v. Watson, 594 F.2d 1330 , 1342 n. 14 (10th Cir.) (defendant could be charged with telephone facilitation if underlying distribution was by either himself or third party), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 78 , 62 L.Ed.2d 51 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles H. Grier and Isaac Harper
It is sufficient if a defendant’s use of a telephone to facilitate the possession or distribution of controlled substances facilitates either his own or another person’s possession or distribution.’ United States v. Phillips, 664 F.2d 971, 1032 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981) (emphasis supplied), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1136 [ 102 S.Ct. 2965 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1354 ] (1982); see United States v. Watson, 594 F.2d 1330 , 1342 n. 14 (10th Cir.) (defendant could be charged with telephone facilitation if underlying distribution was by either himself or third party), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 [ 100 S.Ct. 78 …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Luis Anthony Rivera
(2×)
See United States v. Watson, 594 F.2d 1330, 1341 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 78 , 62 L.Ed.2d 51 (1979). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William A. Kilpatrick, Declan J. O'donnell, Sheila C. Lerner, the Bank of Nova Scotia, Michael Alberga, C.S. Gill, and C.M. Smith
(2×)
See United States v. Watson, 594 F.2d 1330, 1341 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 78 , 62 L.Ed.2d 51 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
DeMartino v. Albert Einstein Medical Center
See, Greenberg v. McCabe, 453 F.Supp. 765 (E.D.Pa.1978), aff’d. 594 F.2d 854 (3d Cir.1979), cert. den., McCabe v. Greenberg, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 79 , 62 L.Ed.2d 51 (1979). 15 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Coastal States Marketing, Inc. And Valero Energy Corporation, Cross-Appellees v. Nelson Bunker Hunt, Cross-Appellants
Fed.R.Civ.P. 16 provides that a pretrial order “when entered controls the subsequent course of the action, unless modified at trial to prevent injustice.” The trial judge has “broad discretion in determining whether or not a pretrial order should be modified or amended.” United States v. Texas, 680 F.2d 356, 370 (5th Cir.1982); accord Del Rio Distributing, Inc. v. Adolph Coors Co., 589 F.2d 176, 178 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 80 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 (1980). 35 Nevertheless, we have recognized that the trial court has not only the right but the duty to relieve a p…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Timothy Smith
See United States v. Watson, 594 F.2d 1330, 1335 (10th Cir. 1979) (“[F]amiliarity with another’s voice may be acquired either before or after the particular speaking which is the subject of the identification.”) (citing Fed.R.Evid. 901(b)(5)), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 78 , 62 L.Ed.2d 51 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mark Prieskorn
(2×)
See United States v. Mancillas, supra, 580 F.2d at 1307 ; accord, United States v. Watson, 594 F.2d 1330, 1337 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 78 , 62 L.Ed.2d 51 (1979); cf. United States v. Martin, 599 F.2d 880, 888-89 (9th Cir.) (person who attempts to purchase small amount of drug for personal use from a member of a conspiracy to sell that drug cannot be convicted by that act alone of facilitation of a conspiracy under 21 U.S.C. § 843 (b)), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 2407 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Grand Rapids Die Casting Corp. v. Local Union No. 159, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers
See Iowa Beef Processors, Inc. v. Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen of North America, AFL-CIO, 597 F.2d 1138 (8th Cir. 1979), cert. denied 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 79 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 ; Fabricut, Inc. v. Tulsa General Drivers, Warehousemen and Helpers, Local 523, 597 F.2d 227 (10th Cir. 1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Rose v. Nashua Board of Education
See Rodriguez de Quinonez v. Perez, 596 F.2d 486 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 78 , 62 L.Ed.2d 51 (1979); Levesque v. State of Maine, 587 F.2d 78 (1st Cir. 1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Medical Laboratory Automation, Inc. v. Labcon, Inc.
See Centsable Products, Inc. v. Lemelson, 591 F.2d 400 (7th Cir.) cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 79 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dressler v. Jenne
“Because it is provided simply to cleanse the reputation of the claimant, the hearing need not take place prior to his termination or to the publication of related information adverse to his interests.” Campbell v. Pierce County, Georgia, at 1345; see also Rodriguez de Quinonez v. Perez, 596 F.2d 486 (1st Cir.) cert, denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 78 , 62 L.Ed.2d 51 (1979) (pre-termination hearing not required but post-termination hearing necessary in case involving liberty interest); White v. Thomas, 660 F.2d 680 (5th Cir.1981) cert, denied 455 U.S. 1027 , 102 S.Ct. 1731 , 72 L.Ed.2d 14…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wackenhut Corp. v. International Union, United Plant Guard Workers
Because an arbitrator “does not sit to dispense his own brand of industrial justice” and “is confined to interpretation and application of the collective bargaining agreement,” id. at 597 , 80 S.Ct. at 1361 , vacatur is required where an arbitrator “exceed[s] the limits of his contractual authority” or where the award “is not derived in some rational way” from the CBA Local 814, Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters v. Sotheby’s, Inc., 665 F.Supp. 1089, 1092 (S.D.N.Y.1987)(quoting American Fed’n of Television and Radio Artists v. Benton & Bowles, Inc., 627 F.Supp. 682, 686 (S.D.N.Y.1986)…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Isaac D. Milton
See also United States v. Watson, 594 F.2d 1330, 1343 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 78 , 62 L.Ed.2d 51 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Foster v. Jackson County, Fla.
See also, Rodriguez de Quinonez v. Perez, 596 F.2d 486 (1st Cir.) cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 78 , 62 L.Ed.2d 51 (1979) (pretermination hearing not required but post-termination hearing necessary in case involving liberty interest); White v. Thomas, 660 F.2d 680 (5th Cir.1981) ce rt. denied 455 U.S. 1027 , 102 S.Ct. 1731 , 72 L.Ed.2d 148 (1982) (post-termination hearing proper remedy for employee deprived of liberty interest during termination); In re Selcraig, 705 F.2d 789 (5th Cir.1983) (state need only inform stigmatized employee that the opportunity to clear his name exists upon…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Butler v. United States
See Fed.R.Evid. 901(b)(5); see also United States v. Watson, 594 F.2d 1330, 1335 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 78 , 62 L.Ed.2d 51 (1979); United States v. Bonanno, 487 F.2d 654, 659 (2d Cir.1973); United States v. Whitaker, 372 F.Supp. 154, 165 (M.D.Pa.), aff'd, 503 F.2d 1400 (3d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1113 , 95 S.Ct. 789 , 42 L.Ed.2d 810 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bunce v. Parkside Lodge of Columbus
Center, 142 Misc.2d 292, 296 [ 537 N.Y.S.2d 446, 448-449 ]; Hoopes v. Hammargren, 102 Nev. 425 , 725 P.2d 238 ; Wall v. Noble, 705 S.W.2d 727 [Tex.App.]; Adams, Sex with Patients: Is it Malpractice?, 23 Trial 58 [June 1987]; see also, Greenberg v. McCabe, 453 F.Supp. 765 , affd. [3 Cir.] 594 F.2d 854 , cert. denied 444 U.S. 840 [ 100 S.Ct. 78 , 79, 62 L.Ed.2d 51 ] * * *).” Stevenson v. Goomar (1989), 148 A.D.2d 217, 226 , 544 N.Y.S.2d 690, 696 , Levine, J., dissenting.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Andrews
Such motions should be granted, however, “only if the targeted allegations are clearly not relevant to the charge and are inflammatory and prejudicial.” United States v. Chaverra-Cardona, 667 F.Supp. *1519 609, 611 (N.D.Ill.1987) (emphasis added) (citing 1 Wright, Federal Practice and Procedure: Criminal 2d § 127, at 425-27 (1982)); see also United States v. Brighton Bldg. & Maintenance Co., 435 F.Supp. 222, 230-31 (N.D.Ill.1977), aff'd, 598 F.2d 1101 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 79 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John Morrell & Company v. Local Union 304a of the United Food and Commercial Workers, Afl-Cio United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, Afl-Cio and Clc Dennis Foster, Individually and in His Capacity as President of Local 304a James R. Lyons, Individually and in His Capacity as Business Representative and Corresponding Secretary of Local 304a John Doe and Other Persons Unknown, John Morrell & Company, a Corporation v. Local Union 304a of the United Food and Commercial Workers, Afl-Cio and Clc United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, Afl-Cio and Clc
See also Iowa Beef Processors v. Amalgamated Meat Cutters, 597 F.2d 1138 , 1144 (8th Cir.) (examined language, external circumstances, and policy considerations to determine whether the right had been waived), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 79 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 (1979). 23 Thus, we must next decide whether the no-strike clause is "ambiguous" in the sense that it is reasonably susceptible of the meaning proposed by Morrell, namely, that the Unions, in clear and unmistakable terms, waived their right to engage in sympathy strikes.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John Morrell & Co. v. Local Union 304A of the United Food & Commercial Workers
See also Iowa Beef Processors v. Amalgamated Meat Cutters, 597 F.2d 1138 , 1144 (8th Cir.) (examined language, external circumstances, and policy considerations to determine whether the right had been waived), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 79 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 (1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jackie Dee Willis
See, e.g., United States v. Watson, 594 F.2d 1330, 1343 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 78 , 62 L.Ed.2d 51 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stevenson v. Goomar
Center, 142 Misc 2d 292, 296 ; Hoopes v Hammargren, 102 Nev 425, 725 P2d 238 ; Wall v Noble, 705 SW2d 727 [Tex]; Adams, Sex with Patients: Is it Malpractice?, 23 Trial 58 [June 1987]; see also, Greenberg v McCabe, 453 F Supp 765 , affd 594 F2d 854, cert denied 444 US 840 ; cf., Roy v Hartogs, 85 Misc 2d 891, 892 ; Atienza v Taub, 194 Cal App 3d 388, 239 Cal Rptr 454).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Donald F. Buxton v. City of Plant City, Florida, Troy E. Surrency, Individually, Troy E. Surrency, in His Official Capacity
See also, Rodriguez de Quinonez v. Perez, 596 F.2d 486 (1st Cir.) cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 78 , 62 L.Ed.2d 51 (1979) (pre-termination hearing not required but post-termination hearing necessary in case involving liberty interest); White v. Thomas, 660 F.2d 680 (5th Cir.1981) cert. denied 455 U.S. 1027 , 102 S.Ct. 1731 , 72 L.Ed.2d 148 (1982) (post-termination hearing proper remedy for employee deprived of liberty interest during termination); In re Selcraig, 705 F.2d 789 (5th Cir.1983) (state need only inform stigmatized employee that the opportunity to clear his name exists upon…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fraternal Order Of Police, Lodge No. 5 v. Kevin M. Tucker
See, e.g., Rodriguez de Quinonez v. Perez, 596 F.2d 486, 490 (1st Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 78 , 62 L.Ed.2d 51 (1979) ("It is true that, strictly read, the statute [under which the plaintiff was removed from office] does not require an official determination or charge of dishonesty, but only a finding that there is sufficient 'evidence' of dishonesty to warrant invoking the statute.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge No. 5 v. Tucker
See, e.g., Rodriguez de Quinonez v. Perez, 596 F.2d 486, 490 (1st Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 78 , 62 L.Ed.2d 51 (1979) (“It is true that, strictly read, the statute [under which the plaintiff was removed from office] does not require an official determination or charge of dishonesty, but only a finding that there is sufficient ‘evidence’ of dishonesty to warrant invoking the statute.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Town of East Hartford v. East Hartford Municipal Employees Union, Inc.
See, e.g., Detroit Coil Co. v. International Assn. of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, Lodge 82, 594 F.2d 575 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S. Ct. 79 , 62 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bernard J. McIntyre
See also United States v. Watson, 594 F.2d 1330, 1335 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 78 , 62 L.Ed.2d 51 (1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
American Fabrics Company v. United Textile Workers of America
See, e.g., Detroit Coil Co. v. International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, Lodge #82, 594 F.2d 575 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S. Ct. 79 , 62 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Chaverra-Cardona
See also United States v. Brighton Building & Maintenance Co., 435 F.Supp. 222, 230-31 (N.D.Ill.1977), aff'd, 598 F.2d 1101 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 79 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 (1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Smith Grading and Paving, Inc. And Herbert P. Lee, Iii, United States of America v. Dellinger, Inc. And Theodore C. Dellinger
See also United States v. Brighton Building, 598 F.2d 1101 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 79 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jane Doe v. United States Department of Justice
(2×)
See, e.g., Rodriguez de Quihonez v. Perez, 596 F.2d 486, 488-89 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 78 , 62 L.Ed.2d 51 (1979); Beitzell v. Jeffrey, 643 F.2d 870, 878 (1st Cir.1981); Huntley v. Community School Bd., 543 F.2d 979, 984-86 (2nd Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 929 , 97 S.Ct. 1547 , 51 L.Ed.2d 773 (1977); McKnight v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transp.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Engelhard Minerals & Chemicals Corp. v. Anglo-American Clays Corp.
See also Centsable Products, Inc. v. Lemelson, 591 F.2d 400, 403 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 79 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 (1979); Haloro, Inc. v. Owens-Fiberglas Corp., 288 F.2d 148, 149 (D.C.Cir.1961); Continental Can Co. v. Anchor Hocking Glass Corp., 362 F.2d 123, 127 (7th Cir.19.66); A.E.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Dorothy Jefferson
See also United States v. Watson, 594 F.2d 1330, 1342-43 (10th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Brown v. United States, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 78 , 62 L.Ed.2d 51 (1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sadik Xheka and Beha Xheka
Fed.R.Evid. 801(d)(1)(A); see also United States v. Brighton Building & Maintenance Co., 598 F.2d 1101, 1108 (7th Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 79 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
William C. Howard v. V. A. Gonzales
See, e. g., United States v. Brighton Building Maintenance Co., 598 F.2d 1101 , 1108 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 80 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 (1969); United States v. Mosley, 555 F.2d 191, 193 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 851 , 98 S.Ct. 163 , 54 L.Ed.2d 120 (1977); National Land & Investment Co. v. Specter, 428 F.2d 91, 97 (3d Cir. 1970); Gollaher v. United States, 419 F.2d 520, 523 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 960 , 90 S.Ct. 434 , 24 L.Ed.2d 424 (1979); 8 J.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Perez, Secretary of the Treasury of Puerto Rico
v.
Rodriguez de Quiñonez
v.
Rodriguez de Quiñonez
No. 78-1863.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1979.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Third Circuit (2) · N.D. Illinois (1) · D. Massachusetts (1) · New Jersey Superior Court App … (1)
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.