green
Positive treatment
5.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Hill v. Hill
The case was remanded "for further consideration in light of McCarty v. McCarty,” 453 U.S. at 213, 101 S. Ct. at 3152. 5 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Energy Development Corp.
See Illinois v. Outboard Marine Corp., 619 F.2d 623 (7th Cir.1980) (“The same day the Supreme Court decided Erie it laid the groundwork for a ‘specialized common law.’ Since that time courts have fashioned federal common law ‘when there is an overriding federal interest in the need for a uniform rule of decision or where the controversy touches basic interests of federalism.’ ” (quoting Illinois v. Milwaukee, 406 U.S. 91 , 105 n. 6, 92 S.Ct. 1385 , 31 L.Ed.2d 712 (1972)), rev’d on other grounds, 453 U.S. 917 , 101 S.Ct. 3152 , 69 L.Ed.2d 1000 (1981)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wilson v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance
See Illinois v. Outboard Marine Corp., 619 F.2d 623, 631-32 (7th Cir.1980) (holding that the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, which provided that any citizen “may intervene” in certain actions, allowed intervention by the state (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)), vacated and remanded on other grounds by 453 U.S. 917 , 101 S.Ct. 3152 , 69 L.Ed.2d 1000 (1981); Raite Rubbish Removal Corp. v. Onondaga County, 161 F.R.D. 236, 237-38 (N.D.N.Y.1995 mem.) (allowing intervention of the state under 28 U.S.C. § 2403 (b), which provides that a state “has an absolute right to inter…
cited
Cited "see"
Butcher v. Butcher
See In re Miller, 187 Mont. 286 , 609 P.2d 1185 (1980), vacated and remanded sub nom., Miller v. Miller, 435 U.S. 918 , 101 S.Ct. 3152 , 69 L.Ed.2d 1000 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Outboard Marine Corp.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Outboard Marine Corp. v. Illinois, 453 U.S. 917 , 101 S.Ct. 3152 , 69 L.Ed.2d 1000 (1981) (Mem.); Outboard Marine Corp. v. Thomas, 773 F.2d 883 (7th Cir.1985); State of Illinois v. Outboard Marine Corp., Inc., 680 F.2d 473 (7th Cir.1982); State of Illinois v. Outboard Marine Corp., 619 F.2d 623 (7th Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Outboard Marine Corp.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Outboard Marine Corp. v. Illinois, 453 U.S. 917 , 101 S.Ct. 3152 , 69 L.Ed.2d 1000 (1981) (Mem.); Outboard Marine Corp. v. Thomas, 773 F.2d 883 (7th Cir.1985); State of Illinois v. Outboard Marine Corp., Inc., 680 F.2d 473 (7th Cir.1982); State of Illinois v. Outboard Marine Corp., 619 F.2d 623 (7th Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc. v. Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd.
See also Illinois v. Outboard Marine Corp., 619 F.2d 623, 631 (7 Cir.1980), vacated and remanded, 453 U.S. 917 , 101 S.Ct. 3152 , 69 L.Ed.2d 1000 (1981), on remand, 680 F.2d 473 (7 Cir.1982) (citing City of Evansville , but similarly failing to address the issue of availability of citizen suit penalties for past violations); Pawtuxet Cove Marina v. Ciba-Geigy Corp., 21 Env’t Rep.Cas.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc. v. Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd.
See also Illinois v. Outboard Marine Corp., 619 F.2d 623, 631 (7 Cir.1980), vacated and remanded, 453 U.S. 917 , 101 S.Ct. 3152 , 69 L.Ed.2d 1000 (1981), on remand, 680 F.2d 473 (7 Cir.1982) (citing City of Evansville, but similarly failing to address the issue of availability of citizen suit penalties for past violations); Pawtuxet Cove Marina v. Ciba-Geigy Corp., 21 Env't Rep.Cas.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Outboard Marine Corp.
State of Illinois v. Outboard Marine Corporation, 680 F.2d 473, 480-81 (7th Cir.1982); see also State of Illinois v. Outboard Marine Corporation, 619 F.2d 623, 630-32 (7th Cir.1980), vacated and remanded, 453 U.S. 917 , 101 S.Ct. 3152 , 69 L.Ed.2d 1000 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Isaacson Structural Steel Co. v. Armco Steel Corp.
See also In re Marriage of Milhan, 27 Cal.3d 765 , 166 Cal.Rptr. 533, 540 , 613 P.2d 812, 819 (1980), vacated and remanded on other grounds, - U.S. -, 101 S.Ct. 3152 , 69 L.Ed.2d 1000 (1981). 12 The better rule, according to Armco, is the one adopted in Texas: [W]hen the trial court’s judgment is erroneous, the judgment of the court of civil appeals must take its place and plaintiff is entitled to interest from the date of the erroneous judgment.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co.
v.
Hall
v.
Hall
No. 79-1896.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jul 2, 1981.
Consideration, Took.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Ct. App. La., 2d Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. Hall, ante, p. 571.
Justice Stewart took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.