green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.7 score
“(w)e are loathe to equate a municipal fireman with a paratrooper or even with such a quasi-soldier as the recalcitrant officer-dermatologist levy.”
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Benny B. Barrett, Cross-Appellant v. Carl Thomas, Sheriff, Cross-Appellee
(2×)
(w)e are loathe to equate a municipal fireman with a paratrooper or even with such a quasi-soldier as the recalcitrant officer-dermatologist levy.
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Complaint Against Judge Harper
See Davis v. Williams (C.A.5, 1980), 617 F.2d 1100 , certiorari denied (1980), 449 U.S. 937 , 101 S.Ct. 336 , 66 L.Ed.2d 160 (upholding constitutionality of fire department regulation prohibiting conduct prejudicial to good order), and Vorbeck v. Schnicker (C.A.8, 1981), 660 F.2d 1260 , certiorari denied (1982), 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1278 , 71 L.Ed.2d 462 (declining jurisdiction because of lack of actual case and controversy, while indicating that police regulations, like military regulations, are generally cast in broad terms).
cited
Cited "see"
Smith v. Shalala
See Rutherford v. United States, 616 F.2d 455 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 937 , 101 S.Ct. 336 , 66 L.Ed.2d 160 (1980); accord Carnohan v. United States, 616 F.2d 1120 (9th Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fire Fighters Ass'n Dist. of Columbia v. Barry
See Davis v. Williams, 617 F.2d 1100, 1101 (5th Cir.1980) (upholding regulation permitting discharge for “conduct prejudicial to [the] good order” of the fire department), cert. denied 449 U.S. 937 , 101 S.Ct. 336 , 66 L.Ed.2d 160 ; Bickel v. Burckhart, 632 F.2d 1251, 1254 (5th Cir 1980); Janusaitis v. Middlebury Volunteer Fire Dept., 607 F.2d 17, 19 (2nd Cir.1979) (upholding regulation prohibiting “unbecoming conduct detrimental to the welfare or good name of the department”); Kannisto v. City and County of San Francisco, 541 F.2d 841, 842 (9th Cir.1976), (upholding regulation prohibi…
discussed
Cited "see"
Jacob v. Curt
See Rutherford v. United States, 616 F.2d 455, 457 (10th Cir.) (court denied patients’ right to obtain laetrile), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 937 , 101 S.Ct. 336 , 66 L.Ed.2d 160 (1980); see also Carnohan v. United States, 616 F.2d 1120, 1122 (9th Cir.1980); Kulsar v. Ambach, 598 F.Supp. 1124, 1126 (W.D.N.Y.1984); Duncan v. United States, 590 F.Supp. 39, 43 (W.D.Okl.1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Duncan v. United States
See Rutherford v. United States, 616 F.2d 455 (Tenth Cir.1980), cert, denied, 449 U.S. 937 , 101 S.Ct. 336 , 66 L.Ed.2d 160 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Ezra Waters v. Clinton Chaffin, Etc.
See Davis v. Williams, 617 F.2d 1100, 1103-05 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 937 , 101 S.Ct. 336 , 66 L.Ed.2d 160 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jerry Smith, Cross-Appellee v. Atlas Off-Shore Boat Service, Inc., Cross-Appellant
See, e. g., Davis v. Williams, 617 F.2d 1100, 1103 (5th Cir.) (in private employment, the employee can be discharged for almost any reason or for no reason at all), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 937 , *1061 101 S.Ct. 336 , 66 L.Ed.2d 160 (1980); Hyde v. Land-of-Sky Regional Council, 572 F.2d 988, 992 (4th Cir. 1978) (under North Carolina law, if the employee fails to establish that the employment contract was for a definite term, the employment is terminable at the will of either party). 4 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Howell
v.
City of Birmingham
v.
City of Birmingham
No. 80-266.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 20, 1980.
Ct. Crim. App. Ala. Certiorari denied.
Justice Brennan, Justice Stewart, and Justice Marshall would grant certiorari and reverse the conviction.